From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F3A6B0036
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri,  2 May 2014 11:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e53so3259274eek.36
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Fri, 02 May 2014 08:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f45si2031471eet.9.2014.05.02.08.48.53
        for <linux-mm@kvack.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 02 May 2014 08:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 17:48:52 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg, mm: introduce lowlimit reclaim
Message-ID: <20140502154852.GO3446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <1398688005-26207-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
 <1398688005-26207-2-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
 <20140430225550.GD26041@cmpxchg.org>
 <20140502093628.GC3446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20140502120715.GI3446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20140502130118.GK23420@cmpxchg.org>
 <20140502141515.GJ3446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20140502150434.GM23420@cmpxchg.org>
 <20140502151120.GN3446@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20140502153451.GN23420@cmpxchg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140502153451.GN23420@cmpxchg.org>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org

On Fri 02-05-14 11:34:51, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:11:20PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 02-05-14 11:04:34, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > @@ -2236,12 +2246,9 @@ static unsigned __shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> > > >  		do {
> > > >  			struct lruvec *lruvec;
> > > >  
> > > > -			/*
> > > > -			 * Memcg might be under its low limit so we have to
> > > > -			 * skip it during the first reclaim round
> > > > -			 */
> > > > -			if (follow_low_limit &&
> > > > -					!mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(memcg, root)) {
> > > > +			/* Memcg might be protected from the reclaim */
> > > > +			if (force_memcg_guarantee &&
> > > 
> > > respect_?  consider_?
> > 
> > enforce_ ?
> 
> A native speaker might be better at this, but to me it seems weird to
> enforce a promise.  honor_memcg_guarantee?

OK, will go with honor. Thanks!
---