From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Dirty/Access bits vs. page content
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:33:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140427193355.GA17778@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1404270459160.2688@eggly.anvils>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 05:20:25AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Will the hardware fault when it does a translation and needs to update
> > the dirty/access bits while the PTE entry is !present?
>
> Yes - but I'm sure you know that, just not while you wrote the mail ;)
Possibly, but all of a sudden I was fearing hardware was 'creative' and
we'd need something along the lines of what Linus proposed:
entry = atomic_xchg(pte, 0);
flush_tlb();
entry |= *pte;
Or possible event:
*ptep = pte_wrprotect(*ptep);
flush_tlb();
entry = atomic_xchg(ptep, 0);
flush_tlb();
The horrible things one fears.. :-) The latter option would be required
if TLBs would have a write-back dirty bit cache, *shudder*.
> But it will not fault while it still has the entry in its TLB,
> with dirty (and access) bits set in that entry in its TLB.
>
> The problem is with those entries, which already have dirty set
> in the TLB, although it's now cleared in the page table itself.
>
> I'm answering this mail because it only seems to need "Yes";
> but well aware that I've not yet answered your yesterday's mail.
> Sorry, my yesterday had to be spent on... other stuff.
Yeah, not worries, I spend most of the weekend preparing and then having
a birthday party for my (now 3 year old) daughter :-)
> I'm sleeping at present (well, not quite) and preparing a reply in
> the interstices of my sleep - if I don't change my mind before
> answering, I still think shmem needs Linus's (or my) patch.
Oh, absolutely. I wasn't arguing it didn't need it. I was merely
pointing out that if one was to add to Linus' patch such that we'd only
do the force_flush for mapping_cap_account_dirty() we wouldn't need
extra things to deal with shmem.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-27 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1398032742.19682.11.camel@pasglop>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFz1sK+PF96LYYZY7OB7PBpxZu-uNLWLvPiRz-tJsBqX3w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1398054064.19682.32.camel@pasglop>
[not found] ` <1398057630.19682.38.camel@pasglop>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwWHBtihC3w9E4+j4pz+6w7iTnYhTf4N3ie15BM9thxLQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <53558507.9050703@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxGm6J6N=4L7exLUFMr1_siNGHpK=wApd9GPCH1=63PPA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <53559F48.8040808@intel.com>
2014-04-22 0:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-22 0:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-22 5:15 ` Tony Luck
2014-04-22 14:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-22 7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-22 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-22 21:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-22 21:46 ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-22 22:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-22 22:41 ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-23 2:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-23 3:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-23 4:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-23 6:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-04-23 18:41 ` Jan Kara
2014-04-23 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-24 6:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-24 18:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-24 19:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-24 20:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-24 23:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-25 1:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-04-25 2:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-04-25 2:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-25 2:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-04-25 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-25 12:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-25 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 19:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-26 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-27 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-27 12:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-27 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-04-27 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-27 20:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-28 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-28 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-27 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-27 23:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-04-25 16:54 ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-25 18:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-25 22:00 ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-26 3:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-26 3:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-25 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-04-25 19:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-25 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
2014-04-23 20:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-04-24 8:49 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140427193355.GA17778@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox