From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255CC6B0080 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 18:08:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id rd3so10561883pab.11 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wm7si12015614pab.69.2014.04.01.15.08.44 for ; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 15:08:43 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc,shm: increase default size for shmmax Message-Id: <20140401150843.13da3743554ad541629c936d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1396389751.25314.26.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <1396235199.2507.2.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1396306773.18499.22.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140331161308.6510381345cb9a1b419d5ec0@linux-foundation.org> <1396308332.18499.25.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140331170546.3b3e72f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1396371699.25314.11.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1396377083.25314.17.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1396386062.25314.24.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140401142947.927642a408d84df27d581e36@linux-foundation.org> <20140401144801.603c288674ab8f417b42a043@linux-foundation.org> <1396389751.25314.26.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Manfred Spraul , aswin@hp.com, LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:02:31 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 14:48 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:41:54 -0400 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > > > >> > Hmmm so 0 won't really work because it could be weirdly used to disable > > > >> > shm altogether... we cannot go to some negative value either since we're > > > >> > dealing with unsigned, and cutting the range in half could also hurt > > > >> > users that set the limit above that. So I was thinking of simply setting > > > >> > SHMMAX to ULONG_MAX and be done with it. Users can then set it manually > > > >> > if they want a smaller value. > > > >> > > > > >> > Makes sense? > > > >> > > > >> I don't think people use 0 for disabling. but ULONG_MAX make sense to me too. > > > > > > > > Distros could have set it to [U]LONG_MAX in initscripts ten years ago > > > > - less phone calls, happier customers. And they could do so today. > > > > > > > > But they haven't. What are the risks of doing this? > > > > > > I have no idea really. But at least I'm sure current default is much worse. > > > > > > 1. Solaris changed the default to total-memory/4 since Solaris 10 for DB. > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html > > > > > > 2. RHEL changed the default to very big size since RHEL5 (now it is > > > 64GB). Even tough many box don't have 64GB memory at that time. > > > > Ah-hah, that's interesting info. > > > > Let's make the default 64GB? > > But again, yet another arbitrary value... Well, I'm assuming 64GB==infinity. It *was* infinity in the RHEL5 timeframe, but infinity has since become larger so pickanumber. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org