Re: [PATCH] ipc,shm: increase default size for shmmax

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:41:54 -0400 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> > Hmmm so 0 won't really work because it could be weirdly used to disable
> >> > shm altogether... we cannot go to some negative value either since we're
> >> > dealing with unsigned, and cutting the range in half could also hurt
> >> > users that set the limit above that. So I was thinking of simply setting
> >> > SHMMAX to ULONG_MAX and be done with it. Users can then set it manually
> >> > if they want a smaller value.
> >> >
> >> > Makes sense?
> >>
> >> I don't think people use 0 for disabling. but ULONG_MAX make sense to me too.
> >
> > Distros could have set it to [U]LONG_MAX in initscripts ten years ago
> > - less phone calls, happier customers.  And they could do so today.
> >
> > But they haven't.   What are the risks of doing this?
> 
> I have no idea really. But at least I'm sure current default is much worse.
> 
> 1. Solaris changed the default to total-memory/4 since Solaris 10 for DB.
>  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/kernel-resources.html
> 
> 2. RHEL changed the default to very big size since RHEL5 (now it is
> 64GB). Even tough many box don't have 64GB memory at that time.

Ah-hah, that's interesting info.

Let's make the default 64GB?

Then we can blame RH if something goes wrong ;)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>