From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, glommer@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND -mm 01/12] memcg: flush cache creation works before memcg cache destruction
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:07:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317160755.GB30623@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cccfcf74595f26532a6dda7264dc420df82fb8a.1394708827.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
On Thu 13-03-14 19:06:39, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> When we get to memcg cache destruction, either from the root cache
> destruction path or when turning memcg offline, there still might be
> memcg cache creation works pending that was scheduled before we
> initiated destruction. We need to flush them before starting to destroy
> memcg caches, otherwise we can get a leaked kmem cache or, even worse,
> an attempt to use after free.
How can we use-after-free? Even if there is a pending work item to
create a new cache then we keep the css reference for the memcg and
release it from the worker (memcg_create_cache_work_func). So although
this can race with memcg offlining the memcg itself will be still alive.
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 9d489a9e7701..b183aaf1b616 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2904,6 +2904,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(set_limit_mutex);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(activate_kmem_mutex);
> +static struct workqueue_struct *memcg_cache_create_wq;
>
> static inline bool memcg_can_account_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> @@ -3327,6 +3328,15 @@ int __kmem_cache_destroy_memcg_children(struct kmem_cache *s)
> int i, failed = 0;
>
> /*
> + * Since the cache is being destroyed, it shouldn't be allocated from
> + * any more, and therefore no new memcg cache creation works could be
> + * scheduled. However, there still might be pending works scheduled
> + * before the cache destruction was initiated. Flush them before
> + * destroying child caches to avoid nasty races.
> + */
> + flush_workqueue(memcg_cache_create_wq);
> +
> + /*
> * If the cache is being destroyed, we trust that there is no one else
> * requesting objects from it. Even if there are, the sanity checks in
> * kmem_cache_destroy should caught this ill-case.
> @@ -3374,6 +3384,15 @@ static void mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> if (!memcg_kmem_is_active(memcg))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * By the time we get here, the cgroup must be empty. That said no new
> + * allocations can happen from its caches, and therefore no new memcg
> + * cache creation works can be scheduled. However, there still might be
> + * pending works scheduled before the cgroup was turned offline. Flush
> + * them before destroying memcg caches to avoid nasty races.
> + */
> + flush_workqueue(memcg_cache_create_wq);
> +
> mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(params, &memcg->memcg_slab_caches, list) {
> cachep = memcg_params_to_cache(params);
> @@ -3418,7 +3437,7 @@ static void __memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> cw->cachep = cachep;
>
> INIT_WORK(&cw->work, memcg_create_cache_work_func);
> - schedule_work(&cw->work);
> + queue_work(memcg_cache_create_wq, &cw->work);
> }
>
> static void memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> @@ -3621,10 +3640,20 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages(struct page *page, int order)
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg), page);
> memcg_uncharge_kmem(memcg, PAGE_SIZE << order);
> }
> +
> +static void __init memcg_kmem_init(void)
> +{
> + memcg_cache_create_wq = alloc_workqueue("memcg_cache_create", 0, 1);
> + BUG_ON(!memcg_cache_create_wq);
> +}
> #else
> static inline void mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> }
> +
> +static void __init memcg_kmem_init(void)
> +{
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> @@ -7181,6 +7210,7 @@ static int __init mem_cgroup_init(void)
> enable_swap_cgroup();
> mem_cgroup_soft_limit_tree_init();
> memcg_stock_init();
> + memcg_kmem_init();
> return 0;
> }
> subsys_initcall(mem_cgroup_init);
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-17 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-13 15:06 [PATCH RESEND -mm 00/12] kmemcg reparenting Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 01/12] memcg: flush cache creation works before memcg cache destruction Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-17 16:07 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-03-18 8:14 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-18 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2014-03-18 9:28 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 02/12] memcg: fix race in memcg cache destruction path Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-17 16:42 ` Michal Hocko
2014-03-18 8:19 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-18 10:01 ` Michal Hocko
2014-03-18 12:14 ` Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 03/12] memcg: fix root vs memcg cache destruction race Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 04/12] memcg: move slab caches list/mutex init to memcg creation Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 05/12] memcg: add pointer from memcg_cache_params to cache Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 06/12] memcg: keep all children of each root cache on a list Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 07/12] memcg: rework slab charging Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 08/12] memcg: do not charge kmalloc_large allocations Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 09/12] fork: do not charge thread_info to kmemcg Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 10/12] memcg: kill GFP_KMEMCG and stuff Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 11/12] memcg: reparent slab on css offline Vladimir Davydov
2014-03-13 15:06 ` [PATCH RESEND -mm 12/12] slub: make sure all memcg caches have unique names on sysfs Vladimir Davydov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140317160755.GB30623@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox