From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zento.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, bleung@chromium.org, sonnyrao@chromium.org,
semenzato@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backing_dev: Fix hung task on sync
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:23:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311112355.d335295ed62cd480eb5ab33c@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219190139.GQ10134@htj.dyndns.org>
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:01:39 -0500 Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hello, Jan.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:27:31AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > You are the workqueue expert so you may know better ;) But the way I
> > understand it is that queue_delayed_work() does nothing if the timer is
> > already running. Since we queue flusher work to run either immediately or
> > after dirty_writeback_interval we are safe to run queue_delayed_work()
> > whenever we want it to run after dirty_writeback_interval and
> > mod_delayed_work() whenever we want to run it immediately.
>
> Ah, okay, so it's always mod on immediate and queue on delayed. Yeah,
> that should work.
>
> > But it's subtle and some interface where we could say queue delayed work
> > after no later than X would be easier to grasp.
>
> Yeah, I think it'd be better if we had something like
> mod_delayed_work_if_later(). Hmm...
The code comments which you asked for were not forthcoming.
Are you otherwise OK with merging this into 3.14 and -stable?
From: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>
Subject: backing_dev: fix hung task on sync
bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed() used mod_delayed_work() to schedule work to
writeback dirty inodes. The problem with this is that it can delay work
that is scheduled for immediate execution, such as the work from
sync_inodes_sb(). This can happen since mod_delayed_work can now steal
work from a work_queue. This fixes the problem by using
queue_delayed_work instead. This is a regression from the move to the bdi
workqueue design.
The reason that this causes a problem is that laptop-mode will change the
delay, dirty_writeback_centisecs, to 60000 (10 minutes) by default. In
the case that bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed races with sync_inodes_sb, sync
will be stopped for 10 minutes and trigger a hung task. Even if
dirty_writeback_centisecs is not long enough to cause a hung task, we
still don't want to delay sync for that long.
For the same reason, this also changes bdi_writeback_workfn to immediately
queue the work again in the case that the work_list is not empty. The
same problem can happen if the sync work is run on the rescue worker.
Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zento.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@chromium.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 5 +++--
mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/fs-writeback.c~backing_dev-fix-hung-task-on-sync fs/fs-writeback.c
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c~backing_dev-fix-hung-task-on-sync
+++ a/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -1039,8 +1039,9 @@ void bdi_writeback_workfn(struct work_st
trace_writeback_pages_written(pages_written);
}
- if (!list_empty(&bdi->work_list) ||
- (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) && dirty_writeback_interval))
+ if (!list_empty(&bdi->work_list))
+ mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0);
+ else if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) && dirty_writeback_interval)
queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork,
msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10));
diff -puN mm/backing-dev.c~backing_dev-fix-hung-task-on-sync mm/backing-dev.c
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c~backing_dev-fix-hung-task-on-sync
+++ a/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ void bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(struct ba
unsigned long timeout;
timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
- mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &bdi->wb.dwork, timeout);
+ queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &bdi->wb.dwork, timeout);
}
/*
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-15 4:12 Derek Basehore
2014-02-17 9:20 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-18 22:55 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-19 9:27 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-19 19:01 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-11 18:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2014-03-11 20:19 ` Jan Kara
2014-03-15 20:22 ` dbasehore .
2014-03-16 14:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-16 19:13 ` dbasehore .
2014-03-16 20:20 ` dbasehore .
2014-03-17 14:40 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-17 20:53 ` dbasehore .
2014-03-17 20:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-17 9:53 ` Jan Kara
2014-02-19 15:31 ` dbasehore .
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140311112355.d335295ed62cd480eb5ab33c@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dbasehore@chromium.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=semenzato@chromium.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zento.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox