From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
Tim Hockin <thockin@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:23:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140307122359.GA28816@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140306213324.GG17902@htj.dyndns.org>
On Thu 06-03-14 16:33:24, Tejun Heo wrote:
> A bit of addition.
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:23:57PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > This patchset provides a solution to a real-world problem that is not
> > solved with any other patchset. I expect it to be reviewed as any other
> > patchset, it's not an "RFC" from my perspective: it's a proposal for
> > inclusion. Don't worry, Andrew is not going to apply anything
> > accidentally.
>
> I can't force it down your throat but I feel somewhat uneasy about how
> this was posted without any reference to the previous discussion as if
> this were just now being proposed especially as the said discussion
> wasn't particularly favorable to this approach. Prefixing RFC or at
> least pointing back to the original discussion seems like the
> courteous thing to do.
Completely agreed! My first impression when I saw the patchset yesterday
was that it was posted for sake of future LSF discussion. I was also
curious about the missing RFC. Posting it as a proposal for inclusion is
premature before any conclusion is reached.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 3:58 David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:58 ` [patch 01/11] fork: collapse copy_flags into copy_process David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:58 ` [patch 02/11] mm, mempolicy: rename slab_node for clarity David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 03/11] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag David Rientjes
2014-03-07 17:20 ` Andi Kleen
2014-03-07 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 04/11] mm, memcg: add tunable for oom reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-05 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-06 2:53 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 05/11] res_counter: remove interface for locked charging and uncharging David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 06/11] res_counter: add interface for maximum nofail charge David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 07/11] mm, memcg: allow processes handling oom notifications to access reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:12 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 08/11] mm, memcg: add memcg oom reserve documentation David Rientjes
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 09/11] mm, page_alloc: allow system oom handlers to use memory reserves David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 10/11] mm, memcg: add memory.oom_control notification for system oom David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 3:59 ` [patch 11/11] mm, memcg: allow system oom killer to be disabled David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:15 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-05 21:17 ` [patch 00/11] userspace out of memory handling Andrew Morton
2014-03-06 2:52 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-11 12:03 ` Jianguo Wu
2014-03-06 20:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 20:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:08 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:11 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:23 ` David Rientjes
2014-03-06 21:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-06 21:33 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 12:23 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140307122359.GA28816@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=thockin@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox