From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] memcg: update comment about charge reparenting on cgroup exit
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210142344.GI7117@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391792665-21678-4-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Fri 07-02-14 12:04:20, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Reparenting memory charges in the css_free() callback was meant as a
> temporary fix for charges that race with offlining, but after some
> follow-up discussion, it turns out that this is really the right place
> to reparent charges because it guarantees none are in-flight.
>
> Make clear that the reparenting in css_offline() is an optimistic
> sweep of established charges because swapout records might hold up
> css_free() indefinitely, but that in fact the css_free() reparenting
> is the properly synchronized one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
OK, I am still thinking about 2 stage reparenting. LRU drain part called
from css_offline and charge drain from css_free. But this is a
sufficient for now.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 52 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 639cf58b2643..b8a96c7d1167 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6600,51 +6600,29 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> kmem_cgroup_css_offline(memcg);
>
> mem_cgroup_invalidate_reclaim_iterators(memcg);
> - mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(memcg);
> mem_cgroup_destroy_all_caches(memcg);
> vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);
> + /*
> + * Memcg gets css references while charging the res_counter,
> + * so we reparent charges in .css_free() when the references
> + * are gone and we know there are no in-flight charges.
> + *
> + * However, at this time, swapout records also hold css refs
> + * indefinitely beyond offlining, which prevent .css_free()
> + * from being called. But after offlining, css_tryget() is
> + * disabled, which means that all the left-over page cache in
> + * the group would be stuck without being reclaimable. Clear
> + * out all those already established charges optimistically
> + * here, and catch any raced charges in .css_free() later on.
> + */
> + mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(memcg);
> }
>
> static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
> - /*
> - * XXX: css_offline() would be where we should reparent all
> - * memory to prepare the cgroup for destruction. However,
> - * memcg does not do css_tryget() and res_counter charging
> - * under the same RCU lock region, which means that charging
> - * could race with offlining. Offlining only happens to
> - * cgroups with no tasks in them but charges can show up
> - * without any tasks from the swapin path when the target
> - * memcg is looked up from the swapout record and not from the
> - * current task as it usually is. A race like this can leak
> - * charges and put pages with stale cgroup pointers into
> - * circulation:
> - *
> - * #0 #1
> - * lookup_swap_cgroup_id()
> - * rcu_read_lock()
> - * mem_cgroup_lookup()
> - * css_tryget()
> - * rcu_read_unlock()
> - * disable css_tryget()
> - * call_rcu()
> - * offline_css()
> - * reparent_charges()
> - * res_counter_charge()
> - * css_put()
> - * css_free()
> - * pc->mem_cgroup = dead memcg
> - * add page to lru
> - *
> - * The bulk of the charges are still moved in offline_css() to
> - * avoid pinning a lot of pages in case a long-term reference
> - * like a swapout record is deferring the css_free() to long
> - * after offlining. But this makes sure we catch any charges
> - * made after offlining:
> - */
> - mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(memcg);
>
> + mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(memcg);
> memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
> __mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
> }
> --
> 1.8.5.3
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 17:04 [patch 0/8] memcg: charge path cleanups Johannes Weiner
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 1/8] mm: memcg: remove unnecessary preemption disabling Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 2/8] mm: memcg: remove mem_cgroup_move_account_page_stat() Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 3/8] memcg: update comment about charge reparenting on cgroup exit Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 14:23 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-02-10 20:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-11 18:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 4/8] memcg: !memcg && !mm is not allowed for __mem_cgroup_try_charge Johannes Weiner
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 5/8] memcg: remove unnecessary !mm check from try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm() Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 14:29 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 6/8] memcg: get_mem_cgroup_from_mm() Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 7/8] memcg: do not replicate get_mem_cgroup_from_mm in __mem_cgroup_try_charge Johannes Weiner
2014-02-07 17:04 ` [patch 8/8] memcg: sanitize __mem_cgroup_try_charge() call protocol Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 15:28 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 17:07 ` [patch 0/8] memcg: charge path cleanups Michal Hocko
2014-03-10 15:55 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140210142344.GI7117@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox