From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDCD6B0031 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:51:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id kl14so6752379pab.1 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b4si4966253pbe.298.2014.02.10.12.51.04 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:51:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:51:02 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] drop_caches: add some documentation and info message Message-Id: <20140210125102.86de67241664da038676af7d@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20140207212601.GI6963@cmpxchg.org> References: <1391794851-11412-1-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <52F51E19.9000406@redhat.com> <20140207181332.GG6963@cmpxchg.org> <20140207123129.84f9fb0aaf32f0e09c78851a@linux-foundation.org> <20140207212601.GI6963@cmpxchg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen , Michal Hocko , KOSAKI Motohiro , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:26:01 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:31:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:13:32 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > > > @@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write, > > > iterate_supers(drop_pagecache_sb, NULL); > > > if (sysctl_drop_caches & 2) > > > drop_slab(); > > > + printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO "%s (%d): dropped kernel caches: %d\n", > > > + current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), > > > + sysctl_drop_caches); > > > } > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > My concern with this is that there may be people whose > > other-party-provided software uses drop_caches. Their machines will > > now sit there emitting log messages and there's nothing they can do > > about it, apart from whining at their vendors. > > Ironically, we have a customer that is complaining that we currently > do not log these events, and they want to know who in their stack is > being idiotic. Right. But if we release a kernel which goes blah on every write to drop_caches, that customer has logs full of blahs which they are now totally uninterested in. > > We could do something like this? > > They can already change the log level. Suppressing unrelated things... > The below will suppress > valuable debugging information in a way that still results in > inconspicuous looking syslog excerpts, which somewhat undermines the > original motivation for this change. Yes, somewhat. It is a compromise. You can see my concern here? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org