From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Markus Blank-Burian <burian@muenster.de>,
Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@gmail.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:45:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207134533.GC5121@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402061541560.31342@eggly.anvils>
On Thu 06-02-14 15:56:01, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Sometimes the cleanup after memcg hierarchy testing gets stuck in
> mem_cgroup_reparent_charges(), unable to bring non-kmem usage down to 0.
>
> There may turn out to be several causes, but a major cause is this: the
> workitem to offline parent can get run before workitem to offline child;
> parent's mem_cgroup_reparent_charges() circles around waiting for the
> child's pages to be reparented to its lrus, but it's holding cgroup_mutex
> which prevents the child from reaching its mem_cgroup_reparent_charges().
>
> Just use an ordered workqueue for cgroup_destroy_wq.
Hmm, interesting. Markus has seen hangs even with mem_cgroup_css_offline
and the referenced cgroup fixes, maybe this is the the right one
finally.
> Fixes: e5fca243abae ("cgroup: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup destruction")
> Suggested-by: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10+
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
e5fca243abae was marked for 3.9 stable but I do not see it in the Greg's
3.9 stable branch so 3.10+ seems to be sufficient.
> ---
>
> kernel/cgroup.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- 3.14-rc1/kernel/cgroup.c 2014-02-02 18:49:07.737302111 -0800
> +++ linux/kernel/cgroup.c 2014-02-06 15:20:35.548904965 -0800
> @@ -4845,12 +4845,12 @@ static int __init cgroup_wq_init(void)
> /*
> * There isn't much point in executing destruction path in
> * parallel. Good chunk is serialized with cgroup_mutex anyway.
> - * Use 1 for @max_active.
> + * Must be ordered to make sure parent is offlined after children.
> *
> * We would prefer to do this in cgroup_init() above, but that
> * is called before init_workqueues(): so leave this until after.
> */
> - cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0, 1);
> + cgroup_destroy_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("cgroup_destroy", 0);
> BUG_ON(!cgroup_destroy_wq);
>
> /*
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 23:56 Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 13:45 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-02-07 14:04 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 14:37 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 15:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 15:28 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-07 20:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 20:35 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 21:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-07 15:21 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-07 16:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-02-10 15:46 ` Michal Hocko
2014-02-12 22:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-12 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] cgroup: bring back kill_cnt to order css destruction Hugh Dickins
2014-02-13 0:28 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-13 0:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-02-13 0:09 ` [PATCH] Revert "cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction" Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140207134533.GC5121@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=burian@muenster.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=filbranden@google.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=shawn.bohrer@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox