From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com (mail-ea0-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0146B0031 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:21:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q10so483523ead.10 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 06:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l2si1312547een.167.2014.01.16.06.21.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jan 2014 06:21:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:21:41 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [patch v2 -mm] mm, oom: prefer thread group leaders for display purposes Message-ID: <20140116142141.GF28157@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20140116070549.GL6963@cmpxchg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 15-01-14 23:46:44, David Rientjes wrote: > When two threads have the same badness score, it's preferable to kill the > thread group leader so that the actual process name is printed to the > kernel log rather than the thread group name which may be shared amongst > several processes. I am not sure I understand this. Is this about ->comm? If yes then why couldn't the group leader do PR_SET_NAME? > This was the behavior when select_bad_process() used to do > for_each_process(), but it now iterates threads instead and leads to > ambiguity. > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes > --- > v2: fixes missing get_task_struct() found by Johannes. > > mm/memcontrol.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- > mm/oom_kill.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index a815686..d69c4b3 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1841,13 +1841,18 @@ static void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask, > break; > }; > points = oom_badness(task, memcg, NULL, totalpages); > - if (points > chosen_points) { > - if (chosen) > - put_task_struct(chosen); > - chosen = task; > - chosen_points = points; > - get_task_struct(chosen); > - } > + if (points < chosen_points) > + continue; > + /* Prefer thread group leaders for display purposes */ > + if (points == chosen_points && > + thread_group_leader(chosen)) > + continue; > + > + if (chosen) > + put_task_struct(chosen); > + chosen = task; > + chosen_points = points; > + get_task_struct(chosen); > } > css_task_iter_end(&it); > } > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > index 054ff47..1dca3d8 100644 > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > @@ -327,10 +327,14 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(unsigned int *ppoints, > break; > }; > points = oom_badness(p, NULL, nodemask, totalpages); > - if (points > chosen_points) { > - chosen = p; > - chosen_points = points; > - } > + if (points < chosen_points) > + continue; > + /* Prefer thread group leaders for display purposes */ > + if (points == chosen_points && thread_group_leader(chosen)) > + continue; > + > + chosen = p; > + chosen_points = points; > } > if (chosen) > get_task_struct(chosen); -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org