From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] mm: oom_kill: revert 3% system memory bonus for privileged tasks
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:43:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140115234308.GB4407@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
With a63d83f427fb ("oom: badness heuristic rewrite"), the OOM killer
tries to avoid killing privileged tasks by subtracting 3% of overall
memory (system or cgroup) from their per-task consumption. But as a
result, all root tasks that consume less than 3% of overall memory are
considered equal, and so it only takes 33+ privileged tasks pushing
the system out of memory for the OOM killer to do something stupid and
kill sshd or dhclient. For example, on a 32G machine it can't tell
the difference between the 1M agetty and the 10G fork bomb member.
The changelog describes this 3% boost as the equivalent to the global
overcommit limit being 3% higher for privileged tasks, but this is not
the same as discounting 3% of overall memory from _every privileged
task individually_ during OOM selection.
Revert back to the old priority boost of pretending root tasks are
only a quarter of their actual size.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 1e4a600a6163..1b0011c3d9e2 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -166,11 +166,11 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
task_unlock(p);
/*
- * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
- * implementation used by LSMs.
+ * Memory consumption being equal, prefer killing an
+ * unprivileged task over a root task.
*/
if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
- adj -= 30;
+ points /= 4;
/* Normalize to oom_score_adj units */
adj *= totalpages / 1000;
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 23:43 Johannes Weiner [this message]
2014-01-16 0:18 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-16 7:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-01-22 4:53 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-24 4:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-01-26 3:48 ` [patch] mm, oom: base root bonus on current usage David Rientjes
2014-01-26 15:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2014-01-29 20:28 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-30 0:35 ` David Rientjes
2014-01-30 2:12 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140115234308.GB4407@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox