From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcg: fix endless iteration in reclaim
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:34:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140114133457.GD32227@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114132727.GB32227@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue 14-01-14 14:27:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 13-01-14 17:52:30, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On one home machine I can easily reproduce (by rmdir of memcgdir during
> > reclaim) multiple processes stuck looping forever in mem_cgroup_iter():
> > __mem_cgroup_iter_next() keeps selecting the memcg being destroyed, fails
> > to tryget it, returns NULL to mem_cgroup_iter(), which goes around again.
>
> So you had a single memcg (without any children) and a limit-reclaim
> on it when you removed it, right? This is nasty because
> __mem_cgroup_iter_next will try to skip it but there is nothing else so
> it returns NULL. We update iter->generation++ but that doesn't help us
> as prev = NULL as this is the first iteration so
> if (prev && reclaim->generation != iter->generation)
>
> break out will not help us.
And looking closer at it we even do no need to be in reclaim
for_each_mem_cgroup_tree is used from more places and that might race as
well.
> You patch will surely help I am just not
> sure it is the right thing to do. Let me think about this.
>
> Anyway very well spotted!
>
> > It's better to err on the side of leaving the loop too soon than never
> > when such races occur: once we've served prev (using root if none),
> > get out the next time __mem_cgroup_iter_next() cannot deliver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > ---
> > Securing the tree iterator against such races is difficult, I've
> > certainly got it wrong myself before. Although the bug is real, and
> > deserves a Cc stable, you may want to play around with other solutions
> > before committing to this one. The current iterator goes back to v3.12:
> > I'm really not sure if v3.11 was good or not - I never saw the problem
> > in the vanilla kernel, but with Google mods in we also had to make an
> > adjustment, there to stop __mem_cgroup_iter() being called endlessly
> > from the reclaim level.
> >
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- mmotm/mm/memcontrol.c 2014-01-10 18:25:02.236448954 -0800
> > +++ linux/mm/memcontrol.c 2014-01-12 22:21:10.700570471 -0800
> > @@ -1254,8 +1252,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struc
> > reclaim->generation = iter->generation;
> > }
> >
> > - if (prev && !memcg)
> > + if (!memcg) {
> > + if (!prev)
> > + memcg = root;
> > goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > }
> > out_unlock:
> > rcu_read_unlock();
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 1:50 [PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: fix last_dead_count memory wastage Hugh Dickins
2014-01-14 1:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/memcg: fix endless iteration in reclaim Hugh Dickins
2014-01-14 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-14 13:34 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2014-01-14 14:26 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-14 20:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-15 9:58 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-15 12:17 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-15 21:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-16 8:17 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-16 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-16 19:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-17 15:41 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-21 5:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-21 8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-21 10:45 ` [PATCH -mm 1/2] memcg: fix endless loop caused by mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2014-01-21 10:45 ` [PATCH -mm 2/2] memcg: fix css reference leak and endless loop in mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2014-01-21 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-21 21:18 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-22 8:27 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-23 10:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-23 11:09 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-23 12:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2014-01-22 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-14 1:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: iteration skip memcgs not yet fully initialized Hugh Dickins
2014-01-14 13:30 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-14 14:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-01-15 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-15 8:21 ` Michal Hocko
2014-01-14 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/memcg: fix last_dead_count memory wastage Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140114133457.GD32227@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox