From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD156B0031 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 03:34:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id e49so8233829eek.7 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h45si87829720eeo.172.2014.01.07.00.34.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:34:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 09:34:25 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: could you clarify mm/mempolicy: fix !vma in new_vma_page() Message-ID: <20140107083425.GB8756@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20140106112422.GA27602@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20140106141827.GB27602@dhcp22.suse.cz> <52cb81ed.e3d8420a.72a1.ffffea65SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <52cb83e3.c9903c0a.614e.1751SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52cb83e3.c9903c0a.614e.1751SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Wanpeng Li Cc: Sasha Levin , Bob Liu , Naoya Horiguchi , Bob Liu , Linux-MM , LKML On Tue 07-01-14 12:34:34, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Cced Sasha, > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:26:13PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > >Hi Michal, > >On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 03:18:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > >>On Mon 06-01-14 20:45:54, Bob Liu wrote: > >>[...] > >>> 544 if (PageAnon(page)) { > >>> 545 struct anon_vma *page__anon_vma = page_anon_vma(page); > >>> 546 /* > >>> 547 * Note: swapoff's unuse_vma() is more efficient with this > >>> 548 * check, and needs it to match anon_vma when KSM is active. > >>> 549 */ > >>> 550 if (!vma->anon_vma || !page__anon_vma || > >>> 551 vma->anon_vma->root != page__anon_vma->root) > >>> 552 return -EFAULT; > >>> 553 } else if (page->mapping && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_NONLINEAR)) { > >>> 554 if (!vma->vm_file || > >>> 555 vma->vm_file->f_mapping != page->mapping) > >>> 556 return -EFAULT; > >>> 557 } else > >>> 558 return -EFAULT; > >>> > >>> That's the "other conditions" and the reason why we can't use > >>> BUG_ON(!vma) in new_vma_page(). > >> > >>Sorry, I wasn't clear with my question. I was interested in which of > >>these triggered and why only for hugetlb pages? > > > >Not just for hugetlb pages, sorry for do two things in one patch. The change > >for hugetlb pages is to fix the potential dereference NULL pointer reported > >by Dan. http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=137689530323257&w=2 > > > >If we should ask Sasha to add more debug information to dump which condition > >is failed in page_address_in_vma() for you? I am always more calm when the removed BUG_ON is properly understood and justified. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org