From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, azurIt <azurit@pobox.sk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into the allocator
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:51:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131011135157.cad19680e02cc4140ecdff0b@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381265890-11333-2-git-send-email-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:58:10 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> Buffer allocation has a very crude indefinite loop around waking the
> flusher threads and performing global NOFS direct reclaim because it
> can not handle allocation failures.
>
> The most immediate problem with this is that the allocation may fail
> due to a memory cgroup limit, where flushers + direct reclaim might
> not make any progress towards resolving the situation at all. Because
> unlike the global case, a memory cgroup may not have any cache at all,
> only anonymous pages but no swap. This situation will lead to a
> reclaim livelock with insane IO from waking the flushers and thrashing
> unrelated filesystem cache in a tight loop.
>
> Use __GFP_NOFAIL allocations for buffers for now. This makes sure
> that any looping happens in the page allocator, which knows how to
> orchestrate kswapd, direct reclaim, and the flushers sensibly. It
> also allows memory cgroups to detect allocations that can't handle
> failure and will allow them to ultimately bypass the limit if reclaim
> can not make progress.
>
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1005,9 +1005,19 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
> struct buffer_head *bh;
> sector_t end_block;
> int ret = 0; /* Will call free_more_memory() */
> + gfp_t gfp_mask;
>
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index,
> - (mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS)|__GFP_MOVABLE);
> + gfp_mask = mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS;
> + gfp_mask |= __GFP_MOVABLE;
> + /*
> + * XXX: __getblk_slow() can not really deal with failure and
> + * will endlessly loop on improvised global reclaim. Prefer
> + * looping in the allocator rather than here, at least that
> + * code knows what it's doing.
> + */
> + gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOFAIL;
Yup. When I added GFP_NOFAIL all those years ago there were numerous
open-coded try-forever loops, and GFP_NOFAIL was more a cleanup than
anything else - move the loop into the page allocator, leaving behind a
sentinel which says "this code sucks and should be fixed". Of course,
nothing has since been fixed :(
So apart from fixing a bug, this patch continues this conversion. I
can't think why I didn't do it a decade ago!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-11 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 20:58 [patch 1/2] mm: memcg: handle non-error OOM situations more gracefully Johannes Weiner
2013-10-08 20:58 ` [patch 2/2] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into the allocator Johannes Weiner
2013-10-11 20:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-12-04 0:59 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-04 1:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-04 2:07 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-04 2:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-04 15:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-04 16:02 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-04 16:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-05 8:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-05 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-06 8:57 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-13 6:58 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-12-13 16:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2013-12-16 8:22 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131011135157.cad19680e02cc4140ecdff0b@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=azurit@pobox.sk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox