From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B86B0031 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:06:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v10so9112880pde.38 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:06:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 13:06:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes Message-Id: <20131008130624.d7c50cef20d968e8c0484a41@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20131008200224.GB19040@moon> References: <20131008090019.527108154@gmail.com> <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org> <20131008200224.GB19040@moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:02:24 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be > > sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable? > > Good question! Yeah, since dirty bit traking is in 3.11 already, > it would be great to merge these two patches into -stable. OK. > Should I resend them with stable team CC'ed? Nope, I added cc:stable to the changelogs so they should receive consideration by Greg automatically. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org