From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com (mail-pb0-f51.google.com [209.85.160.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5626B0031 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:15:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id jt11so6365006pbb.10 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:16:30 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: correct missing private flag clearing Message-ID: <20131001011630.GA21009@lge.com> References: <1380527985-18499-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <20130930143514.63fc5b2b4316caed33e1c1b1@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130930143514.63fc5b2b4316caed33e1c1b1@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Hugh Dickins , Davidlohr Bueso , David Gibson , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li , Naoya Horiguchi , Hillf Danton On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:35:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:59:44 +0900 Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > We should clear the page's private flag when returing the page to > > the page allocator or the hugepage pool. This patch fixes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim > > --- > > Hello, Andrew. > > > > I sent the new version of commit ('07443a8') before you did pull request, > > but it isn't included. It may be losted :) > > So I send this fix. IMO, this is good for v3.12. > > > > Thanks. > > > > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c > > index b49579c..691f226 100644 > > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c > > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c > > @@ -653,6 +653,7 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *page) > > BUG_ON(page_count(page)); > > BUG_ON(page_mapcount(page)); > > restore_reserve = PagePrivate(page); > > + ClearPagePrivate(page); > > > > You describe it as a fix, but what does it fix? IOW, what are the > user-visible effects of the change? > > update_and_free_page() already clears PG_private, but afaict the bit > remains unaltered if free_huge_page() takes the enqueue_huge_page() > route. Yes, you are right. I attach another version having more explanation. Please refer this and merge it. Thanks. ------------------------->8---------------------------------