From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Robin Holt <robinmholt@gmail.com>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 02/10] mm: convert mm->nr_ptes to atomic_t
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 01:24:51 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130927222451.3406EE0090@blue.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5245EEAD.7010901@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cody P Schafer wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 06:16 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > With split page table lock for PMD level we can't hold
> > mm->page_table_lock while updating nr_ptes.
> >
> > Let's convert it to atomic_t to avoid races.
> >
>
> > ---
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > index 84e0c56e1e..99f19e850d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
> > pgd_t * pgd;
> > atomic_t mm_users; /* How many users with user space? */
> > atomic_t mm_count; /* How many references to "struct mm_struct" (users count as 1) */
> > + atomic_t nr_ptes; /* Page table pages */
> > int map_count; /* number of VMAs */
> >
> > spinlock_t page_table_lock; /* Protects page tables and some counters */
> > @@ -360,7 +361,6 @@ struct mm_struct {
> > unsigned long exec_vm; /* VM_EXEC & ~VM_WRITE */
> > unsigned long stack_vm; /* VM_GROWSUP/DOWN */
> > unsigned long def_flags;
> > - unsigned long nr_ptes; /* Page table pages */
> > unsigned long start_code, end_code, start_data, end_data;
> > unsigned long start_brk, brk, start_stack;
> > unsigned long arg_start, arg_end, env_start, env_end;
>
> Will 32bits always be enough here? Should atomic_long_t be used instead?
Good question!
On x86_64 we need one table to cover 2M (512 entries by 4k, 21 bits) of
virtual address space. Total size of virtual memory which can be covered
by 31-bit (32 - sign) nr_ptes is 52 bits (31 + 21).
Currently, on x86_64 with 4-level page tables we can use at most 48 bit of
virtual address space (only half of it available for userspace), so we
pretty safe here.
Although, it can be a potential problem, if (when) x86_64 will implement
5-level page tables -- 57-bits of virtual address space.
Any thoughts?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-27 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 13:16 [PATCHv4 00/10] split page table lock for PMD tables Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 01/10] mm: rename USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS to USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 02/10] mm: convert mm->nr_ptes to atomic_t Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 20:46 ` Cody P Schafer
2013-09-27 21:01 ` Dave Hansen
2013-09-27 22:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2013-09-28 0:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-09-28 16:12 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 03/10] mm: introduce api for split page table lock for PMD level Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 04/10] mm, thp: change pmd_trans_huge_lock() to return taken lock Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 05/10] mm, thp: move ptl taking inside page_check_address_pmd() Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 06/10] mm, thp: do not access mm->pmd_huge_pte directly Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 07/10] mm, hugetlb: convert hugetlbfs to use split pmd lock Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 08/10] mm: convent the rest to new page table lock api Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 09/10] mm: implement split page table lock for PMD level Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-10-03 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-03 23:38 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-10-04 0:34 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-10-04 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-03 23:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-09-27 13:16 ` [PATCHv4 10/10] x86, mm: enable " Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-10-04 20:12 ` [PATCHv4 00/10] split page table lock for PMD tables Alex Thorlton
2013-10-04 20:26 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-10-04 20:31 ` Alex Thorlton
2013-10-07 9:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-10-08 21:47 ` Alex Thorlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130927222451.3406EE0090@blue.fi.intel.com \
--to=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
--cc=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=robinmholt@gmail.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox