From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmpressure: fix divide-by-0 in vmpressure_work_fn
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:46:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130912114600.GB4828@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1309111233200.2912@eggly.anvils>
On Wed 11-09-13 13:04:33, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > From 888745909da34f8aee8a208a82d467236b828d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:48:10 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] vmpressure: fix divide-by-0 in vmpressure_work_fn
> >
> > Hugh Dickins has reported a division by 0 when a vmpressure event is
> > processed. The reason for the exception is that a single vmpressure
> > work item (which is per memcg) might be processed by multiple CPUs
> > because it is enqueued on system_wq which is !WQ_NON_REENTRANT.
> > This means that the out of lock vmpr->scanned check in
> > vmpressure_work_fn is inherently racy and the racing workers will see
> > already zeroed scanned value after they manage to take the spin lock.
> >
> > The patch simply moves the vmp->scanned check inside the sr_lock to fix
> > the race.
> >
> > The issue was there since the very beginning but "vmpressure: change
> > vmpressure::sr_lock to spinlock" might have made it more visible as the
> > racing workers would sleep on the mutex and give it more time to see
> > updated value. The issue was still there, though.
> >
> > Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> Nack! But equally Nack to my original.
>
> Many thanks for looking into how this might have happened, Michal,
> and for mentioning the WQ_NON_REENTRANT flag: which I knew nothing
> about, but have now followed up.
> I owe you all an abject apology: what I didn't mention in my patch
> was that actually I hit the problem on a v3.3-based kernel to which
> vmpressure had been backported.
>
> I have not yet seen the problem on v3.11 or v3.10, and now believe
> that it cannot happen there - which would explain why I was the
> first to hit it.
>
> When I looked up WQ_NON_REENTRANT in the latest tree, I found
> WQ_NON_REENTRANT = 1 << 0, /* DEPRECATED */
> and git blame on that line leads to Tejun explaining
>
> dbf2576e37 ("workqueue: make all workqueues non-reentrant") made
> WQ_NON_REENTRANT no-op but the following patches didn't remove the
> flag or update the documentation. Let's mark the flag deprecated and
> update the documentation accordingly.
Goon point. I didn't check the code and relied on the documentation.
Thanks for pointing this out.
> dbf2576e37 went into v3.7, so I now believe this divide-by-0 could
> only happen on a backport of vmpressure to an earlier kernel than that.
git grep WQ_NON_REENTRANT on kernel/workqueue.c really shows nothing so
I guess you are right.
Andrew, please drop the patch.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-12 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-07 5:59 Hugh Dickins
2013-09-08 1:43 ` David Rientjes
2013-09-09 11:08 ` Michal Hocko
2013-09-11 15:40 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-09-11 16:03 ` Michal Hocko
2013-09-11 16:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-09-11 20:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-09-12 11:46 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-09-11 5:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130912114600.GB4828@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox