From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hush Bensen <hush.bensen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: add compaction to zone_reclaim_mode
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 01:48:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130807234800.GG4661@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807161837.GW2296@suse.de>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 05:18:37PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > It is important to boot with numa_zonelist_order=n (n means nodes) to
> > get more accurate NUMA locality if there are multiple zones per node.
> >
>
> This appears to be an unrelated observation.
But things still don't work ok without it. After alloc_batch changes
it matters only in the slowpath but it still related.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/swap.h | 8 +++-
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 4 +-
> > mm/vmscan.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index f2ada36..fedb246 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > @@ -3549,27 +3567,35 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > return sc.nr_reclaimed >= nr_pages;
> > }
> >
> > -int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > +static int zone_reclaim_compact(struct zone *preferred_zone,
> > + struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > + unsigned int order,
> > + bool sync_compaction,
> > + bool *need_compaction)
> > {
> > - int node_id;
> > - int ret;
> > + bool contended;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Zone reclaim reclaims unmapped file backed pages and
> > - * slab pages if we are over the defined limits.
> > - *
> > - * A small portion of unmapped file backed pages is needed for
> > - * file I/O otherwise pages read by file I/O will be immediately
> > - * thrown out if the zone is overallocated. So we do not reclaim
> > - * if less than a specified percentage of the zone is used by
> > - * unmapped file backed pages.
> > - */
> > - if (zone_pagecache_reclaimable(zone) <= zone->min_unmapped_pages &&
> > - zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) <= zone->min_slab_pages)
> > - return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
> > + if (compaction_deferred(preferred_zone, order) ||
> > + !order ||
> > + (gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO)) != (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO)) {
> > + *need_compaction = false;
> > + return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
> > - return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL;
> > + *need_compaction = true;
> > + return compact_zone_order(zone, order,
> > + gfp_mask,
> > + sync_compaction,
> > + &contended);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int zone_reclaim(struct zone *preferred_zone, struct zone *zone,
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> > + unsigned long mark, int classzone_idx, int alloc_flags)
> > +{
> > + int node_id;
> > + int ret, c_ret;
> > + bool sync_compaction = false, need_compaction = false;
> >
> > /*
> > * Do not scan if the allocation should not be delayed.
> > @@ -3587,7 +3613,56 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > if (node_state(node_id, N_CPU) && node_id != numa_node_id())
> > return ZONE_RECLAIM_NOSCAN;
> >
> > +repeat_compaction:
> > + /*
> > + * If this allocation may be satisfied by memory compaction,
> > + * run compaction before reclaim.
> > + */
> > + c_ret = zone_reclaim_compact(preferred_zone,
> > + zone, gfp_mask, order,
> > + sync_compaction,
> > + &need_compaction);
> > + if (need_compaction &&
> > + c_ret != COMPACT_SKIPPED &&
>
> need_compaction records whether compaction was attempted or not. Why
> not just check for COMPACT_SKIPPED and have compact_zone_order return
> COMPACT_SKIPPED if !CONFIG_COMPACTION?
How can it be ok that try_to_compact_pages returns COMPACT_CONTINUE
but compact_zone order returns the opposite? I mean either we change
both or none.
static inline unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask,
bool sync, bool *contended)
{
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
}
static inline unsigned long compact_zone_order(struct zone *zone,
int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
bool sync, bool *contended)
{
return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-02 16:06 [PATCH 0/9] adding compaction to zone_reclaim_mode v3 Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: zone_reclaim: remove ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-07 15:13 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: scan all memory with /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-06 5:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: don't depend on kswapd to invoke reset_isolation_suitable Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 19:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: reset before initializing the scan cursors Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 19:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: don't require high order pages below min wmark Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:35 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-06 13:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-07 15:42 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-07 16:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-07 16:47 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-08 0:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: increase the high order pages in the watermarks Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:36 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-06 16:08 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-06 18:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-08-07 13:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-07 15:43 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: export compact_zone_order() Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:37 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-07 15:48 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: zone_reclaim: after a successful zone_reclaim check the min watermark Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:38 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-07 15:53 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-02 16:06 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: zone_reclaim: compaction: add compaction to zone_reclaim_mode Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-04 16:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-08-05 18:38 ` Rik van Riel
2013-08-07 16:18 ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-07 23:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2013-08-08 8:22 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130807234800.GG4661@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=hush.bensen@gmail.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=richard@arachsys.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox