From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx102.postini.com [74.125.245.102]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED25E6B0031 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:33:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:33:21 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks Message-ID: <20130730093321.GO3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1375170505-5967-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130730081755.GF3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130730082001.GG3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130730091542.GA28656@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130730091542.GA28656@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Mel Gorman , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Preeti U Murthy , Linus Torvalds On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:45:43PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > Can you please suggest workloads that I could try which might showcase > why you hate pure process based approach? 2 processes, 1 sysvshm segment. I know there's multi-process MPI libraries out there. Something like: perf bench numa mem -p 2 -G 4096 -0 -z --no-data_rand_walk -Z -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org