From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx162.postini.com [74.125.245.162]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E0956B0033 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:20:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:20:01 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Improve numa scheduling by consolidating tasks Message-ID: <20130730082001.GG3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1375170505-5967-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130730081755.GF3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130730081755.GF3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Mel Gorman , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML , Preeti U Murthy , Linus Torvalds On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 01:18:15PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Here is an approach that looks to consolidate workloads across nodes. > > This results in much improved performance. Again I would assume this work > > is complementary to Mel's work with numa faulting. > > I highly dislike the use of task weights here. It seems completely > unrelated to the problem at hand. I also don't particularly like the fact that it's purely process based. The faults information we have gives much richer task relations. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org