From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] mm, hugetlb: do not use a page in page cache for cow optimization
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:56:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716015600.GH2430@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d2qkj5b7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:25:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes:
>
> > Currently, we use a page with mapped count 1 in page cache for cow
> > optimization. If we find this condition, we don't allocate a new
> > page and copy contents. Instead, we map this page directly.
> > This may introduce a problem that writting to private mapping overwrite
> > hugetlb file directly. You can find this situation with following code.
> >
> > size = 20 * MB;
> > flag = MAP_SHARED;
> > p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flag, fd, 0);
> > if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > return -1;
> > }
> > p[0] = 's';
> > fprintf(stdout, "BEFORE STEAL PRIVATE WRITE: %c\n", p[0]);
> > munmap(p, size);
> >
> > flag = MAP_PRIVATE;
> > p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flag, fd, 0);
> > if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > }
> > p[0] = 'c';
> > munmap(p, size);
> >
> > flag = MAP_SHARED;
> > p = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, flag, fd, 0);
> > if (p == MAP_FAILED) {
> > fprintf(stderr, "mmap() failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > return -1;
> > }
> > fprintf(stdout, "AFTER STEAL PRIVATE WRITE: %c\n", p[0]);
> > munmap(p, size);
> >
> > We can see that "AFTER STEAL PRIVATE WRITE: c", not "AFTER STEAL
> > PRIVATE WRITE: s". If we turn off this optimization to a page
> > in page cache, the problem is disappeared.
>
> Do we need to trun of the optimization for page cache completely ?
> Can't we check for MAP_PRIVATE case ?
IMO, we need to turn off the optimization for page cache completely.
This optimization works just for MAP_PRIVATE case.
If we map with MAP_SHARED, we map a page from page cache directly,
so we don't need this cow optimization.
>
> Also, we may want to add the above test into libhugetlbfs
I will submit the above test into libhugetlbfs.
Thanks.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index d4a1695..6c1eb9b 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -2512,7 +2512,6 @@ static int hugetlb_cow(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > {
> > struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
> > struct page *old_page, *new_page;
> > - int avoidcopy;
> > int outside_reserve = 0;
> > unsigned long mmun_start; /* For mmu_notifiers */
> > unsigned long mmun_end; /* For mmu_notifiers */
> > @@ -2522,10 +2521,8 @@ static int hugetlb_cow(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > retry_avoidcopy:
> > /* If no-one else is actually using this page, avoid the copy
> > * and just make the page writable */
> > - avoidcopy = (page_mapcount(old_page) == 1);
> > - if (avoidcopy) {
> > - if (PageAnon(old_page))
> > - page_move_anon_rmap(old_page, vma, address);
> > + if (page_mapcount(old_page) == 1 && PageAnon(old_page)) {
> > + page_move_anon_rmap(old_page, vma, address);
> > set_huge_ptep_writable(vma, address, ptep);
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> -aneesh
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 9:52 [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm, hugetlb: move up the code which check availability of free huge page Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 3:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 5:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-22 14:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm, hugetlb: trivial commenting fix Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 13:12 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-15 14:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-22 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up alloc_huge_page() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-22 14:51 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-23 7:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm, hugetlb: fix and clean-up node iteration code to alloc or free Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-17 2:00 ` Jianguo Wu
2013-07-18 6:46 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm, hugetlb: remove redundant list_empty check in gather_surplus_pages() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-22 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm, hugetlb: do not use a page in page cache for cow optimization Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 13:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:56 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-07-17 8:55 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-17 8:55 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm, hugetlb: add VM_NORESERVE check in vma_has_reserves() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 15:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 2:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 5:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 7:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-18 2:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-18 2:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm, hugetlb: remove decrement_hugepage_resv_vma() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-17 9:31 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-17 9:31 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm, hugetlb: decrement reserve count if VM_NORESERVE alloc page cache Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 15:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-18 2:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-18 2:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 14:10 ` [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:27 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 1:45 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:55 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 2:14 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130716015600.GH2430@lge.com \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox