linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, minchan@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 5/6] mm: vmscan: batch shrink_page_list() locking operations
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:50:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130714235028.GE23628@hacker.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AD84BA.4090106@sr71.net>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:10:02PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>On 06/03/2013 10:01 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> > +static int __remove_mapping_batch(struct list_head *remove_list,
>>> > +				  struct list_head *ret_pages,
>>> > +				  struct list_head *free_pages)
>>> > +{
>>> > +	int nr_reclaimed = 0;
>>> > +	struct address_space *mapping;
>>> > +	struct page *page;
>>> > +	LIST_HEAD(need_free_mapping);
>>> > +
>>> > +	while (!list_empty(remove_list)) {
>...
>>> > +		if (!__remove_mapping(mapping, page)) {
>>> > +			unlock_page(page);
>>> > +			list_add(&page->lru, ret_pages);
>>> > +			continue;
>>> > +		}
>>> > +		list_add(&page->lru, &need_free_mapping);
>...
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>> +	while (!list_empty(&need_free_mapping)) {...
>> +		list_move(&page->list, free_pages);
>> +		mapping_release_page(mapping, page);
>> +	}
>> Why do we need new lru list instead of using @free_pages?
>
>I actually tried using @free_pages at first.  The problem is that we
>need to call mapping_release_page() without the radix tree lock held so
>we can not do it in the first while() loop.
>
>'free_pages' is a list created up in shrink_page_list().  There can be
>several calls to __remove_mapping_batch() for each call to
>shrink_page_list().
>
>'need_free_mapping' lets us temporarily differentiate the pages that we
>need to call mapping_release_page()/unlock_page() on versus the ones on
>'free_pages' which have already had that done.
>
>We could theoretically delay _all_ of the
>release_mapping_page()/unlock_page() operations until the _entire_
>shrink_page_list() operation is done, but doing this really helps with
>lock_page() latency.
>
>Does that make sense?

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
>see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-14 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-03 20:02 [v5][PATCH 0/6] mm: vmscan: Batch page reclamation under shink_page_list Dave Hansen
2013-06-03 20:02 ` [v5][PATCH 1/6] mm: swap: defer clearing of page_private() for swap cache pages Dave Hansen
2013-07-14 23:47   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-14 23:47   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 20:02 ` [v5][PATCH 2/6] mm: swap: make 'struct page' and swp_entry_t variants of swapcache_free() Dave Hansen
2013-07-14 23:48   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-14 23:48   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 20:02 ` [v5][PATCH 3/6] mm: vmscan: break up __remove_mapping() Dave Hansen
2013-07-14 23:49   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-14 23:49   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 20:02 ` [v5][PATCH 4/6] mm: vmscan: break out mapping "freepage" code Dave Hansen
2013-07-14 23:49   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-14 23:49   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 20:02 ` [v5][PATCH 5/6] mm: vmscan: batch shrink_page_list() locking operations Dave Hansen
2013-06-04  1:17   ` Hillf Danton
2013-06-04  5:07     ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04 15:22       ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-05  7:28       ` Hillf Danton
2013-06-05  7:57         ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-05 14:24         ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-04  5:01   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04  6:02     ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04 15:29       ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-04 23:32         ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04  6:10     ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-04  6:59       ` Minchan Kim
2013-07-14 23:50       ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2013-07-14 23:50       ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-03 20:02 ` [v5][PATCH 6/6] mm: vmscan: drain batch list during long operations Dave Hansen
2013-06-04  6:05   ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04 15:24     ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-04 23:23       ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04 23:31         ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-04 23:36           ` Minchan Kim
2013-06-04 23:37   ` Minchan Kim
2013-07-14 23:51   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-14 23:51   ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='20130714235028.GE23628@hacker.(null)' \
    --to=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox