linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com>
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, riel@redhat.com, dev@parallels.com,
	xemul@parallels.com, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bfoster@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jbottomley@parallels.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	fengguang.wu@intel.com, devel@openvz.org, mgorman@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: strictlimit feature -v2
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:38:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702123804.9f252487f86c12b0f4edee57@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130702174316.15075.84993.stgit@maximpc.sw.ru>

On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 21:44:47 +0400 Maxim Patlasov <MPatlasov@parallels.com> wrote:

> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> 
> The feature prevents mistrusted filesystems to grow a large number of dirty
> pages before throttling. For such filesystems balance_dirty_pages always
> check bdi counters against bdi limits. I.e. even if global "nr_dirty" is under
> "freerun", it's not allowed to skip bdi checks. The only use case for now is
> fuse: it sets bdi max_ratio to 1% by default and system administrators are
> supposed to expect that this limit won't be exceeded.
> 
> The feature is on if address space is marked by AS_STRICTLIMIT flag.
> A filesystem may set the flag when it initializes a new inode.
> 
> Changed in v2 (thanks to Andrew Morton):
>  - added a few explanatory comments
>  - cleaned up the mess in backing_dev_info foo_stamp fields: now it's clearly
>    stated that bw_time_stamp is measured in jiffies; renamed other foo_stamp
>    fields to reflect that they are in units of number-of-pages.
> 

Better, thanks.

The writeback arithemtic makes my head spin - I'd really like Fengguang
to go over this, please.

A quick visit from the spelling police:

>
> ...
>
> @@ -41,8 +43,15 @@ typedef int (congested_fn)(void *, int);
>  enum bdi_stat_item {
>  	BDI_RECLAIMABLE,
>  	BDI_WRITEBACK,
> -	BDI_DIRTIED,
> -	BDI_WRITTEN,
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The three counters below reflects number of events of specific type
> +	 * happened since bdi_init(). The type is defined in comments below:

"The three counters below reflect the number of events of specific
types since bdi_init()"

> +	 */
> +	BDI_DIRTIED,	  /* a page was dirtied */
> +	BDI_WRITTEN,	  /* writeout completed for a page */
> +	BDI_WRITTEN_BACK, /* a page went to writeback */
> +
>  	NR_BDI_STAT_ITEMS
>  };
>  
>
> ...
>
> @@ -680,28 +712,55 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * global setpoint
> +	 * The strictlimit feature is a tool preventing mistrusted filesystems
> +	 * to grow a large number of dirty pages before throttling. For such

"from growing"

> +	 * filesystems balance_dirty_pages always checks bdi counters against
> +	 * bdi limits. Even if global "nr_dirty" is under "freerun". This is
> +	 * especially important for fuse who sets bdi->max_ratio to 1% by

s/who/which/

> +	 * default. Without strictlimit feature, fuse writeback may consume
> +	 * arbitrary amount of RAM because it is accounted in
> +	 * NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP which is not involved in calculating "nr_dirty".
>
> ...
>
> @@ -994,6 +1054,26 @@ static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	 * keep that period small to reduce time lags).
>  	 */
>  	step = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * For strictlimit case, balanced_dirty_ratelimit was calculated

balance_dirty_ratelimit?

> +	 * above based on bdi counters and limits (see bdi_position_ratio()).
> +	 * Hence, to calculate "step" properly, we have to use bdi_dirty as
> +	 * "dirty" and bdi_setpoint as "setpoint".
> +	 *
> +	 * We rampup dirty_ratelimit forcibly if bdi_dirty is low because
> +	 * it's possible that bdi_thresh is close to zero due to inactivity
> +	 * of backing device (see the implementation of bdi_dirty_limit()).
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(strictlimit)) {
> +		dirty = bdi_dirty;
> +		if (bdi_dirty < 8)
> +			setpoint = bdi_dirty + 1;
> +		else
>
> ...
>
> @@ -1057,18 +1140,32 @@ void __bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
>  	if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(bdi->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
>  		goto snapshot;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Skip periods when backing dev was idle due to abscence of pages

"absence"

> +	 * under writeback (when over_bground_thresh() returns false)
> +	 */
> +	if (test_bit(BDI_idle, &bdi->state) &&
> +	    bdi->writeback_nr_stamp == writeback)
>
> ...
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-29 17:41 [PATCH v5 00/16] fuse: An attempt to implement a write-back cache policy Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:42 ` [PATCH 01/16] fuse: Linking file to inode helper Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:42 ` [PATCH 02/16] fuse: Getting file for writeback helper Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:42 ` [PATCH 03/16] fuse: Prepare to handle short reads Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:42 ` [PATCH 04/16] fuse: Prepare to handle multiple pages in writeback Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:42 ` [PATCH 05/16] fuse: Connection bit for enabling writeback Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:44 ` [PATCH 06/16] fuse: Trust kernel i_size only - v4 Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:44 ` [PATCH 07/16] fuse: Trust kernel i_mtime only Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:45 ` [PATCH 08/16] fuse: Flush files on wb close Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:45 ` [PATCH 09/16] fuse: restructure fuse_readpage() Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:45 ` [PATCH 10/16] fuse: Implement writepages callback Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-19 16:50   ` Miklos Szeredi
2013-08-02 15:40     ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-08-06 16:25       ` Miklos Szeredi
2013-08-06 16:26         ` Eric Boxer
2013-08-09 15:02         ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-08-30 10:12           ` Miklos Szeredi
2013-08-30 14:50             ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-09-03 10:31               ` Miklos Szeredi
2013-09-03 16:02                 ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:45 ` [PATCH 11/16] fuse: Implement write_begin/write_end callbacks Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:46 ` [PATCH 12/16] fuse: fuse_writepage_locked() should wait on writeback Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:46 ` [PATCH 13/16] fuse: fuse_flush() " Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:46 ` [PATCH 14/16] fuse: Fix O_DIRECT operations vs cached writeback misorder - v2 Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:47 ` [PATCH 15/16] fuse: Turn writeback cache on Maxim Patlasov
2013-06-29 17:48 ` [PATCH 16/16] mm: strictlimit feature Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-01 21:16   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-02  8:33     ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-02 17:44   ` [PATCH] mm: strictlimit feature -v2 Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-02 19:38     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-07-03 11:01       ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-07-03 23:16         ` Jan Kara
2013-07-05 13:14           ` Maxim Patlasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130702123804.9f252487f86c12b0f4edee57@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=MPatlasov@parallels.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@parallels.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox