From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx199.postini.com [74.125.245.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A583E6B0037 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:27:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:27:05 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugetlb fixes Message-Id: <20130618132705.c5eb78a20499beb1b769f741@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20130618185055.GA27618@logfs.org> References: <1371581225-27535-1-git-send-email-joern@logfs.org> <20130618185055.GA27618@logfs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:50:55 -0400 J__rn Engel wrote: > On Tue, 18 June 2013 14:47:03 -0400, Joern Engel wrote: > > > > Test program below is failing before these two patches and passing > > after. > > Actually, do we have a place to stuff kernel tests? And if not, > should we have one? Yep, tools/testing/selftests/vm. It's pretty simple and stupid at present - it anything about the framework irritates you, please fix it! General guidelines for tools/testing/selftests: the tool should execute quickly and shouldn't break the overall selftests run at either compile time or runtime if kernel features are absent, Kconfig is unexpected, etc. It's more a "place to accumulate and maintain selftest programs" than a serious self-testing framework. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org