From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch -v4 4/8] memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support predicates
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 10:52:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130605085239.GF15997@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130605080545.GF7303@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Wed 05-06-13 01:05:45, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, Michal.
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:37:28AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Tejun, I do not have infinite amount of time and this is barely a
> > priority for the patchset. The core part is to be able to skip
> > nodes/subtrees which are not worth reclaiming, remember?
> >
> > I have already expressed my priorities for inside skipping
> > decisions. You are just throwing "let's try a different way" handwavy
> > suggestions. I have no problem to pull the skip logic outside of
> > iterators if more people think that this is _really_ important. But
> > until then I take it as a really low priority that shouldn't delay the
> > patchset without a good reason.
> >
> > So please try to focus on the technical parts of the patchset if you
> > want to help with the review. I really appreciate suggestions but please
> > do not get down to bike scheding.
>
> Well, so, I know I've been pain in the ass but here's the thing. I
> don't think you've been doing a good job of maintaining memcg. Among
> the code pieces that I look at, it really ranks very close to the
> bottom in terms of readability and general messiness.
Something, something, something, something and other similar things....
Is this really an argumentation. Comon' Tejun.
I _really_ do not let this into a flame and I will not respond to any
other emails that are not related to the patchset. I do not care and do
not have time for that!
> One of the core jobs of being a maintainer is ensuring the code stays
> in readable and maintainable state.
As you might know I am playing the maintainer role for around year and a
half and there were many improvemtns merged since then (and some faults
as well of course).
There is a lot of space for improvements and I work at areas as time
permits focusing more at reviews for other people are willing to do.
[...]
Please stop distracting from the main purpose of this discussion with
side tracks and personal things.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-03 10:18 [patch v4] Soft limit rework Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 1/8] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 2/8] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 3/8] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 4/8] memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support predicates Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 1:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-04 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 19:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-04 20:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 20:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 7:37 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05 8:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 8:52 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-06-05 8:58 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 9:07 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05 9:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-07 0:48 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-07 8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-10 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 5/8] memcg: track children in soft limit excess to improve soft limit Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 6/8] memcg, vmscan: Do not attempt soft limit reclaim if it would not scan anything Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 7/8] memcg: Track all children over limit in the root Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 10:18 ` [patch -v4 8/8] memcg, vmscan: do not fall into reclaim-all pass too quickly Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 16:27 ` [patch v4] Soft limit rework Balbir Singh
2013-06-04 16:38 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 17:57 ` Balbir Singh
2013-06-04 18:08 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-11 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-17 14:01 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130605085239.GF15997@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox