From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, memcg: add oom killer delay
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 21:31:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130603193147.GC23659@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306031102480.7956@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon 03-06-13 11:18:09, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > I still do not see why you cannot simply read tasks file into a
> > preallocated buffer. This would be few pages even for thousands of pids.
> > You do not have to track processes as they come and go.
> >
>
> What do you suggest when you read the "tasks" file and it returns -ENOMEM
> because kmalloc() fails because the userspace oom handler's memcg is also
> oom?
That would require that you track kernel allocations which is currently
done only for explicit caches.
> Obviously it's not a situation we want to get into, but unless you
> know that handler's exact memory usage across multiple versions, nothing
> else is sharing that memcg, and it's a perfect implementation, you can't
> guarantee it. We need to address real world problems that occur in
> practice.
If you really need to have such a guarantee then you can have a _global_
watchdog observing oom_control of all groups that provide such a vague
requirements for oom user handlers.
> > As I said before. oom_delay_millisecs is actually really easy to be done
> > from userspace. If you really need a safety break then you can register
> > such a handler as a fallback. I am not familiar with eventfd internals
> > much but I guess that multiple handlers are possible. The fallback might
> > be enforeced by the admin (when a new group is created) or by the
> > container itself. Would something like this work for your use case?
> >
>
> You're suggesting another userspace process that solely waits for a set
> duration and then reenables the oom killer?
Yes which kicks the oom killer.
> It faces all the same problems as the true userspace oom handler: it's
> own perfect implementation and it's own memcg constraints.
But that solution might be implemented as a global policy living in a
group with some reservations.
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 1:18 David Rientjes
2013-05-30 15:07 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-30 20:47 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-31 8:10 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-31 10:22 ` David Rientjes
2013-05-31 11:02 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-31 11:21 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-31 19:29 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-01 6:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-01 10:29 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-01 15:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-03 15:34 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 16:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-03 18:03 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 18:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-03 21:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-06-04 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-04 18:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-04 19:27 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 16:31 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 16:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-01 10:20 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-03 18:18 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-03 18:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-03 19:09 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-03 21:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-06-03 19:31 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-06-03 21:17 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-04 9:55 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-05 6:40 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-05 9:39 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-06 0:09 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-10 14:23 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-11 20:33 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-12 20:23 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-12 21:27 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-13 15:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-06-13 22:25 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-14 0:56 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-06-14 10:12 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-19 21:30 ` David Rientjes
2013-06-25 1:39 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-06-26 23:18 ` David Rientjes
2013-07-10 11:23 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-31 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-03 18:00 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130603193147.GC23659@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox