From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v3 -mm 3/3] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:50:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130517075019.GF25158@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51934A62.2030606@parallels.com>
On Wed 15-05-13 12:42:10, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 05/13/2013 11:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Soft reclaim has been done only for the global reclaim (both background
> > and direct). Since "memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone
> > shrinking code" there is no reason for this limitation anymore as the
> > soft limit reclaim doesn't use any special code paths and it is a
> > part of the zone shrinking code which is used by both global and
> > targeted reclaims.
> >
> > From semantic point of view it is even natural to consider soft limit
> > before touching all groups in the hierarchy tree which is touching the
> > hard limit because soft limit tells us where to push back when there is
> > a memory pressure. It is not important whether the pressure comes from
> > the limit or imbalanced zones.
> >
> > This patch simply enables soft reclaim unconditionally in
> > mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim so it is enabled for both global and
> > targeted reclaim paths. mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible needs to learn
> > about the root of the reclaim to know where to stop checking soft limit
> > state of parents up the hierarchy.
> > Say we have
> > A (over soft limit)
> > \
> > B (below s.l., hit the hard limit)
> > / \
> > C D (below s.l.)
> >
> > B is the source of the outside memory pressure now for D but we
> > shouldn't soft reclaim it because it is behaving well under B subtree
> > and we can still reclaim from C (pressumably it is over the limit).
> > mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible should therefore stop climbing up the
> > hierarchy at B (root of the memory pressure).
> >
> > Changes since v1
> > - add sc->target_mem_cgroup handling into mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim_eligible
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org>
Thanks for the review Glauber!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 7:46 [patch v3 0/3 -mm] Soft limit rework Michal Hocko
2013-05-13 7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-05-15 8:34 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-16 22:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 7:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-17 7:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-17 16:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-17 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 17:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-17 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-20 14:44 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-21 6:53 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] memcg: track children in soft limit excess to improve soft limit Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] memcg, vmscan: Do not attempt soft limit reclaim if it would not scan anything Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] memcg: Track all children over limit in the root Michal Hocko
2013-05-27 17:20 ` [PATCH] memcg: enhance memcg iterator to support predicates Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 13:05 ` [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 15:57 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 20:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-05-30 8:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-29 14:54 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-30 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-13 7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 2/3] memcg: Get rid of soft-limit tree infrastructure Michal Hocko
2013-05-15 8:38 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 22:16 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-13 7:46 ` [patch v3 -mm 3/3] vmscan, memcg: Do softlimit reclaim also for targeted reclaim Michal Hocko
2013-05-15 8:42 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-17 7:50 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-05-16 23:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-17 7:34 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130517075019.GF25158@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox