From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx178.postini.com [74.125.245.178]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE3636B0032 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 03:16:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:16:55 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code Message-ID: <20130517071655.GD25158@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1368431172-6844-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <1368431172-6844-2-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <20130516221200.GF7171@mtj.dyndns.org> <20130516221501.GG7171@mtj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130516221501.GG7171@mtj.dyndns.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Ying Han , Hugh Dickins , Glauber Costa , Michel Lespinasse , Greg Thelen , Balbir Singh On Thu 16-05-13 15:15:01, Tejun Heo wrote: > One more thing, > > Given that this is a rather significant behavior change, it probably > is a good idea to include the the benchmark results from the head > message? The testing I have done was on top of the complete series. The last patch should be irrelevant as I have tested the global reclaim but the second patch might still influence figures a tiny bit (we still do the soft limit tree thing). That's why I haven't pushed the numbers here. I can add that information if people prefer or just ask Andrew to squash the leader email into the first patch as he tend to do quite often in other cases as well. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org