Re: [patch v3 -mm 1/3] memcg: integrate soft reclaim tighter with zone shrinking code

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>]

On Thu 16-05-13 15:12:00, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Sorry about the delay.  Just getting back to memcg.
> 
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> ...
> > during the first pass. Only groups which are over their soft limit or
> > any of their parents up the hierarchy is over the limit are considered
> 
> ancestors?

Well, ancestors might or might not be part of the hierarchy, so while it
is much shorter I consider the original more precise.

> > +static void shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> > +{
> > +	bool do_soft_reclaim = mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim(sc);
> > +	unsigned long nr_scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
> > +
> > +	__shrink_zone(zone, sc, do_soft_reclaim);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * No group is over the soft limit or those that are do not have
> > +	 * pages in the zone we are reclaiming so we have to reclaim everybody
> > +	 */
> > +	if (do_soft_reclaim && (sc->nr_scanned == nr_scanned)) {
> > +		__shrink_zone(zone, sc, false);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +}
> 
> Maybe the following is easier to follow?
> 
> 	if (mem_cgroup_should_soft_reclaim(sc)) {
> 		__shrink_zone(zone, sc, true);
> 		if (sc->nr_scanned == nr_scanned)
> 			__shrink_zone(zone, sc, false);
> 	} else {
> 		__shrink_zone(zone, sc, false);
> 	}
> 
> But it's a minor point, please feel free to ignore.

I will stick with the original code as I have some plans to build on top
of that.

>   Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thank you!

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> tejun

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>