linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@sonymobile.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Lekanovic, Radovan" <Radovan.Lekanovic@sonymobile.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] return value from shrinkers
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130516075205.GD24072@caracas.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130515160532.c965e92707c354100e25f79b@linux-foundation.org>

On 01:05 Thu 16 May     , Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:16:33 +0200 Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@sonymobile.com> wrote:
> 
> > In a previous discussion on lkml it was noted that the shrinkers use the
> > magic value "-1" to signal that something went wrong.
> > 
> > This patch-set implements the suggestion of instead using errno.h values
> > to return something more meaningful.
> > 
> > The first patch simply changes the check from -1 to any negative value and
> > updates the comment accordingly.
> > 
> > The second patch updates the shrinkers to return an errno.h value instead
> > of -1. Since this one spans over many different areas I need input on what is
> > a meaningful return value. Right now I used -EBUSY on everything for consitency.
> > 
> > What do you say? Is this a good idea or does it make no sense at all?
> 
> I don't see much point in it, really.  Returning an errno implies that
> the errno will eventually be returned to userspace.  But that isn't the
> case, so such a change is somewhat misleading.

Yes. Glauber Costa pointed that out and I agree - errno.h is probably not
the right way to go.

> If we want the capability to return more than a binary yes/no message
> to callers then yes, we could/should enumerate the shrinker return
> values.  But as that is a different concept from errnos, it should be
> done with a different and shrinker-specific namespace.

Agreed, but even if there right now is only a binary return message, is a
hardcoded -1 considered to be acceptable for an interface? IMHO, it is not
very readable nor intuitive for the users of the interface. Why not, as you
mention, add a define or enum in shrinker.h instead, e.g. SHRINKER_STOP or
something.

-Oskar

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-16  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13 14:16 Oskar Andero
2013-05-13 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: let any negative return value from shrinker mean error Oskar Andero
2013-05-16  0:47   ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-13 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Clean-up shrinker return values Oskar Andero
2013-05-14 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] return value from shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 14:10   ` Oskar Andero
2013-05-15 14:18     ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 14:47       ` Oskar Andero
2013-05-15 14:49         ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16  8:20           ` Oskar Andero
2013-05-16  8:23             ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-16  7:52   ` Oskar Andero [this message]
2013-05-16 16:27     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130516075205.GD24072@caracas.corpusers.net \
    --to=oskar.andero@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=Radovan.Lekanovic@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox