From: Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@sonymobile.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Lekanovic, Radovan" <Radovan.Lekanovic@sonymobile.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] return value from shrinkers
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130516075205.GD24072@caracas.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130515160532.c965e92707c354100e25f79b@linux-foundation.org>
On 01:05 Thu 16 May , Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 16:16:33 +0200 Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@sonymobile.com> wrote:
>
> > In a previous discussion on lkml it was noted that the shrinkers use the
> > magic value "-1" to signal that something went wrong.
> >
> > This patch-set implements the suggestion of instead using errno.h values
> > to return something more meaningful.
> >
> > The first patch simply changes the check from -1 to any negative value and
> > updates the comment accordingly.
> >
> > The second patch updates the shrinkers to return an errno.h value instead
> > of -1. Since this one spans over many different areas I need input on what is
> > a meaningful return value. Right now I used -EBUSY on everything for consitency.
> >
> > What do you say? Is this a good idea or does it make no sense at all?
>
> I don't see much point in it, really. Returning an errno implies that
> the errno will eventually be returned to userspace. But that isn't the
> case, so such a change is somewhat misleading.
Yes. Glauber Costa pointed that out and I agree - errno.h is probably not
the right way to go.
> If we want the capability to return more than a binary yes/no message
> to callers then yes, we could/should enumerate the shrinker return
> values. But as that is a different concept from errnos, it should be
> done with a different and shrinker-specific namespace.
Agreed, but even if there right now is only a binary return message, is a
hardcoded -1 considered to be acceptable for an interface? IMHO, it is not
very readable nor intuitive for the users of the interface. Why not, as you
mention, add a define or enum in shrinker.h instead, e.g. SHRINKER_STOP or
something.
-Oskar
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 14:16 Oskar Andero
2013-05-13 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: let any negative return value from shrinker mean error Oskar Andero
2013-05-16 0:47 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-13 14:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Clean-up shrinker return values Oskar Andero
2013-05-14 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] return value from shrinkers Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 14:10 ` Oskar Andero
2013-05-15 14:18 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 14:47 ` Oskar Andero
2013-05-15 14:49 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-16 8:20 ` Oskar Andero
2013-05-16 8:23 ` Glauber Costa
2013-05-15 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-16 7:52 ` Oskar Andero [this message]
2013-05-16 16:27 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130516075205.GD24072@caracas.corpusers.net \
--to=oskar.andero@sonymobile.com \
--cc=Radovan.Lekanovic@sonymobile.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox