From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mgorman@suse.de, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] create __remove_mapping_batch()
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 14:20:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130507212001.49F5E197@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130507211954.9815F9D1@viggo.jf.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
__remove_mapping_batch() does logically the same thing as
__remove_mapping().
We batch like this so that several pages can be freed with a
single mapping->tree_lock acquisition/release pair. This reduces
the number of atomic operations and ensures that we do not bounce
cachelines around.
It has shown some substantial performance benefits on
microbenchmarks.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
---
linux.git-davehans/mm/vmscan.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~create-remove_mapping_batch mm/vmscan.c
--- linux.git/mm/vmscan.c~create-remove_mapping_batch 2013-05-07 14:00:01.432361260 -0700
+++ linux.git-davehans/mm/vmscan.c 2013-05-07 14:19:32.341148892 -0700
@@ -555,6 +555,56 @@ int remove_mapping(struct address_space
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * pages come in here (via remove_list) locked and leave unlocked
+ * (on either ret_pages or free_pages)
+ *
+ * We do this batching so that we free batches of pages with a
+ * single mapping->tree_lock acquisition/release. This optimization
+ * only makes sense when the pages on remove_list all share a
+ * page->mapping. If this is violated you will BUG_ON().
+ */
+static int __remove_mapping_batch(struct list_head *remove_list,
+ struct list_head *ret_pages,
+ struct list_head *free_pages)
+{
+ int nr_reclaimed = 0;
+ struct address_space *mapping;
+ struct page *page;
+ LIST_HEAD(need_free_mapping);
+
+ if (list_empty(remove_list))
+ return 0;
+
+ mapping = lru_to_page(remove_list)->mapping;
+ spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ while (!list_empty(remove_list)) {
+ int freed;
+ page = lru_to_page(remove_list);
+ BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+ BUG_ON(page->mapping != mapping);
+ list_del(&page->lru);
+
+ freed = __remove_mapping_nolock(mapping, page);
+ if (freed) {
+ list_add(&page->lru, &need_free_mapping);
+ } else {
+ unlock_page(page);
+ list_add(&page->lru, ret_pages);
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+
+ while (!list_empty(&need_free_mapping)) {
+ page = lru_to_page(&need_free_mapping);
+ list_move(&page->list, free_pages);
+ free_mapping_page(mapping, page);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ nr_reclaimed++;
+ }
+ return nr_reclaimed;
+}
+
/**
* putback_lru_page - put previously isolated page onto appropriate LRU list
* @page: page to be put back to appropriate lru list
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-07 21:19 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] mm: Batch page reclamation under shink_page_list Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] defer clearing of page_private() for swap cache pages Dave Hansen
2013-05-09 22:07 ` Seth Jennings
2013-05-09 22:19 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-10 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2013-05-10 14:01 ` Seth Jennings
2013-05-14 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] make 'struct page' and swp_entry_t variants of swapcache_free() Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] break up __remove_mapping() Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:22 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] break out mapping "freepage" code Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:26 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-07 21:20 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2013-05-09 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] create __remove_mapping_batch() Seth Jennings
2013-05-09 22:18 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 15:51 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-16 17:14 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] use __remove_mapping_batch() in shrink_page_list() Dave Hansen
2013-05-14 16:05 ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-14 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] drain batch list during long operations Dave Hansen
2013-05-07 23:56 ` Dave Hansen
2013-05-08 0:42 ` Tim Chen
2013-05-14 16:08 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130507212001.49F5E197@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox