linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom: add pending SIGKILL check for chosen victim
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:51:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422195138.GB31098@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366643184-3627-1-git-send-email-dserrg@gmail.com>

On Mon 22-04-13 19:06:24, Sergey Dyasly wrote:
> Currently, fatal_signal_pending() check is issued only for task that invoked
> oom killer. Add the same check for oom killer's chosen victim.
> 
> This eliminates regression with killing multithreaded processes which was
> introduced by commit 6b0c81b3be114a93f79bd4c5639ade5107d77c21
> (mm, oom: reduce dependency on tasklist_lock). When one of threads
> was oom-killed, other threads could also become victims of oom killer, which
> can cause an infinite loop.
> 
> There is a race with task->thread_group RCU protected list deletion/iteration:
> now only a reference to a chosen thread of dying threadgroup is held, so when
> the thread doesn't have PF_EXITING flag yet and dump_header() is called
> to print info, it already has SIGKILL and can call do_exit(), which removes
> the thread from the thread_group list. After printing info, oom killer
> is doing while_each_thread() on this thread and it still has next reference
> to some other thread, but no other thread has next reference to this one.
> This causes the infinite loop with tasklist_lock read held.

I am not sure I understand the race you are describing here.
release_task calls __exit_signal with tasklist_lock held for write. And
we are holding the very same lock for reading around while_each_thread
in oom_kill_process.
 
> When SIGKILL is sent to a task, it's also sent to all tasks in the same
> threadgroup. This information can be used to prevent triggering further
> oom killers for this threadgroup and avoid the infinite loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/oom_kill.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 79e451a..5c42dd3 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -413,10 +413,11 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
>  					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> -	 * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
> +	 * If the task already has a pending SIGKILL or is exiting, don't alarm
> +	 * the sysadmin or kill its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE
> +	 * so it can die quickly
>  	 */
> -	if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> +	if (fatal_signal_pending(p) || p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
>  		set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
>  		put_task_struct(p);
>  		return;
> -- 
> 1.8.1.2
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-22 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-22 15:06 Sergey Dyasly
2013-04-22 19:51 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-04-23 15:26   ` dserrg
2013-04-23 15:56     ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-24 14:55       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-24 15:22         ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-24 15:42           ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-24 19:33             ` Andrew Morton
2013-04-25 14:49               ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-25 15:41                 ` Sergey Dyasly
2013-04-25 16:22                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-02 17:20                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-27 15:49                       ` Sergey Dyasly
2013-05-27 16:16                         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130422195138.GB31098@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dserrg@gmail.com \
    --cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox