From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx135.postini.com [74.125.245.135]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BD646B0005 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:39:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:39:02 -0700 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Print the correct method to disable automatic numa migration Message-ID: <20130411173902.GM22166@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1365622514-26614-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20130411124803.GK3710@suse.de> <20130411140425.GJ16732@two.firstfloor.org> <20130411141942.GL3710@suse.de> <20130411155304.GK22166@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20130411172508.GC11656@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130411172508.GC11656@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andi Kleen , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org > > But are you taking care of the documentation of all the existing knobs? > > > > Which knobs? The sched_features knobs? No, I was not planning on The sysctls that got added .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_delay_ms", .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_min_ms", .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_reset", .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_period_max_ms", .procname = "numa_balancing_scan_size_mb", Documenting sched_features is likely a lot of work, not sure you're on the hook for that. This may be another incentive to have a separate sysctl :-) -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org