From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH -v2] memcg: don't do cleanup manually if mem_cgroup_css_online() fails
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:04:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402150422.GB32520@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515AEC3A.2030401@parallels.com>
On Tue 02-04-13 18:33:30, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 06:28 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-04-13 18:20:56, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> On 04/02/2013 06:16 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> mem_cgroup_css_online
> >>> memcg_init_kmem
> >>> mem_cgroup_get # refcnt = 2
> >>> memcg_update_all_caches
> >>> memcg_update_cache_size # fails with ENOMEM
> >>
> >> Here is the thing: this one in kmem only happens for kmem enabled
> >> memcgs. For those, we tend to do a get once, and put only when the last
> >> kmem reference is gone.
> >>
> >> For non-kmem memcgs, refcnt will be 1 here, and will be balanced out by
> >> the mem_cgroup_put() in css_free.
> >
> > So we need this, right?
> > ---
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index f608546..2ef875d 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -5306,6 +5306,8 @@ static int memcg_propagate_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > ret = memcg_update_cache_sizes(memcg);
> > mutex_unlock(&set_limit_mutex);
> > out:
> > + if (ret)
> > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > return ret;
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
> > @@ -6417,16 +6419,6 @@ mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup *cont)
> >
> > error = memcg_init_kmem(memcg, &mem_cgroup_subsys);
> > mutex_unlock(&memcg_create_mutex);
> > - if (error) {
> > - /*
> > - * We call put now because our (and parent's) refcnts
> > - * are already in place. mem_cgroup_put() will internally
> > - * call __mem_cgroup_free, so return directly
> > - */
> > - mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
> > - if (parent->use_hierarchy)
> > - mem_cgroup_put(parent);
> > - }
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> >
> Yes, indeed you are very right - and thanks for looking at such depth.
So what about the patch bellow? It seems that I provoked all this mess
but my brain managed to push it away so I do not remember why I thought
the parent needs reference drop... It is "only" 3.9 thing fortunately.
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 7:35 [PATCH] " Li Zefan
2013-04-02 8:03 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-02 8:07 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 8:34 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-02 8:42 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 8:43 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 12:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-02 12:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-02 13:36 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-03 3:43 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-02 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-02 14:20 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-02 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-02 15:04 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-04-03 3:49 ` [PATCH -v2] " Li Zefan
2013-04-03 7:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 7:49 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-03 8:18 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-04-03 8:37 ` Li Zefan
2013-04-03 8:50 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 8:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "memcg: avoid dangling reference count in creation failure." Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] memcg, kmem: clean up reference count handling on the error path Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-03 8:08 ` [PATCH -v2] memcg: don't do cleanup manually if mem_cgroup_css_online() fails Glauber Costa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402150422.GB32520@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox