From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] memcg: remove memcg from the reclaim iterators
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:10:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212151002.GD15951@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130212095419.GB4863@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:54:19AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 11-02-13 17:39:43, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:27:56PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 11-02-13 14:58:24, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > That way, if the dead count gives the go-ahead, you KNOW that the
> > > > position cache is valid, because it has been updated first.
> > >
> > > OK, you are right. We can live without css_tryget because dead_count is
> > > either OK which means that css would be alive at least this rcu period
> > > (and RCU walk would be safe as well) or it is incremented which means
> > > that we have started css_offline already and then css is dead already.
> > > So css_tryget can be dropped.
> >
> > Not quite :)
> >
> > The dead_count check is for completed destructions,
>
> Not quite :P. dead_count is incremented in css_offline callback which is
> called before the cgroup core releases its last reference and unlinks
> the group from the siblinks. css_tryget would already fail at this stage
> because CSS_DEACT_BIAS is in place at that time but this doesn't break
> RCU walk. So I think we are safe even without css_get.
But you drop the RCU lock before you return.
dead_count IS incremented for every destruction, but it's not reliable
for concurrent ones, is what I meant. Again, if there is a dead_count
mismatch, your pointer might be dangling, easy case. However, even if
there is no mismatch, you could still race with a destruction that has
marked the object dead, and then frees it once you drop the RCU lock,
so you need try_get() to check if the object is dead, or you could
return a pointer to freed or soon to be freed memory.
/*
* If the dead_count mismatches, a destruction has happened or is
* happening concurrently. If the dead_count matches, a destruction
* might still happen concurrently, but since we checked under RCU,
* that destruction won't free the object until we release the RCU
* reader lock. Thus, the dead_count check verifies the pointer is
* still valid, css_tryget() verifies the cgroup pointed to is alive.
*/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-03 17:54 [PATCH v3 0/7] rework mem_cgroup iterator Michal Hocko
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] memcg: synchronize per-zone iterator access by a spinlock Michal Hocko
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] memcg: keep prev's css alive for the whole mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] memcg: rework mem_cgroup_iter to use cgroup iterators Michal Hocko
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] memcg: remove memcg from the reclaim iterators Michal Hocko
2013-01-07 6:18 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-02-08 19:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-11 15:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-11 17:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-11 19:29 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-11 19:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-11 21:27 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-11 22:07 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-11 22:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-12 9:54 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 15:10 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2013-02-12 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-02-12 17:25 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-12 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-02-12 19:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-13 9:51 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 17:56 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 16:24 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 16:37 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 16:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-12 17:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 17:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-13 8:11 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-13 10:38 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-13 10:34 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-13 12:56 ` Michal Hocko
2013-02-12 16:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] memcg: further " Michal Hocko
2013-01-03 17:54 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] cgroup: remove css_get_next Michal Hocko
2013-01-04 3:42 ` Li Zefan
2013-01-23 12:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] rework mem_cgroup iterator Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130212151002.GD15951@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox