[PATCH for 3.2.34] memcg: do not trigger OOM if PF_NO_MEMCG_OOM is set

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>]

On Wed 06-02-13 15:22:19, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 06-02-13 15:01:19, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 06-02-13 02:17:21, azurIt wrote:
> > > >5-memcg-fix-1.patch is not complete. It doesn't contain the folloup I
> > > >mentioned in a follow up email. Here is the full patch:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Here is the log where OOM, again, killed MySQL server [search for "(mysqld)"]:
> > > http://www.watchdog.sk/lkml/oom_mysqld6
> > 
> > [...]
> > WARNING: at mm/memcontrol.c:2409 T.1149+0x2d9/0x610()
> > Hardware name: S5000VSA
> > gfp_mask:4304 nr_pages:1 oom:0 ret:2
> > Pid: 3545, comm: apache2 Tainted: G        W    3.2.37-grsec #1
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff8105502a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
> >  [<ffffffff81055116>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff81108163>] ? mem_cgroup_margin+0x73/0xa0
> >  [<ffffffff8110b6f9>] T.1149+0x2d9/0x610
> >  [<ffffffff812af298>] ? blk_finish_plug+0x18/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff8110c6b4>] mem_cgroup_cache_charge+0xc4/0xf0
> >  [<ffffffff810ca6bf>] add_to_page_cache_locked+0x4f/0x140
> >  [<ffffffff810ca7d2>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x22/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff810cad32>] filemap_fault+0x252/0x4f0
> >  [<ffffffff810eab18>] __do_fault+0x78/0x5a0
> >  [<ffffffff810edcb4>] handle_pte_fault+0x84/0x940
> >  [<ffffffff810e2460>] ? vma_prio_tree_insert+0x30/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff810f2508>] ? vma_link+0x88/0xe0
> >  [<ffffffff810ee6a8>] handle_mm_fault+0x138/0x260
> >  [<ffffffff8102709d>] do_page_fault+0x13d/0x460
> >  [<ffffffff810f46fc>] ? do_mmap_pgoff+0x3dc/0x430
> >  [<ffffffff815b61ff>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
> > ---[ end trace 8817670349022007 ]---
> > apache2 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x0, order=0, oom_adj=0, oom_score_adj=0
> > apache2 cpuset=uid mems_allowed=0
> > Pid: 3545, comm: apache2 Tainted: G        W    3.2.37-grsec #1
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff810ccd2e>] dump_header+0x7e/0x1e0
> >  [<ffffffff810ccc2f>] ? find_lock_task_mm+0x2f/0x70
> >  [<ffffffff810cd1f5>] oom_kill_process+0x85/0x2a0
> >  [<ffffffff810cd8a5>] out_of_memory+0xe5/0x200
> >  [<ffffffff810cda7d>] pagefault_out_of_memory+0xbd/0x110
> >  [<ffffffff81026e76>] mm_fault_error+0xb6/0x1a0
> >  [<ffffffff8102734e>] do_page_fault+0x3ee/0x460
> >  [<ffffffff810f46fc>] ? do_mmap_pgoff+0x3dc/0x430
> >  [<ffffffff815b61ff>] page_fault+0x1f/0x30
> > 
> > The first trace comes from the debugging WARN and it clearly points to
> > a file fault path. __do_fault pre-charges a page in case we need to
> > do CoW (copy-on-write) for the returned page. This one falls back to
> > memcg OOM and never returns ENOMEM as I have mentioned earlier. 
> > However, the fs fault handler (filemap_fault here) can fallback to
> > page_cache_read if the readahead (do_sync_mmap_readahead) fails
> > to get page to the page cache. And we can see this happening in
> > the first trace. page_cache_read then calls add_to_page_cache_lru
> > and eventually gets to add_to_page_cache_locked which calls
> > mem_cgroup_cache_charge_no_oom so we will get ENOMEM if oom should
> > happen. This ENOMEM gets to the fault handler and kaboom.
> > 
> > So the fix is really much more complex than I thought. Although
> > add_to_page_cache_locked sounded like a good place it turned out to be
> > not in fact.
> > 
> > We need something more clever appaerently. One way would be not misusing
> > __GFP_NORETRY for GFP_MEMCG_NO_OOM and give it a real flag. We have 32
> > bits for those flags in gfp_t so there should be some room there. 
> > Or we could do this per task flag, same we do for NO_IO in the current
> > -mm tree.
> > The later one seems easier wrt. gfp_mask passing horror - e.g.
> > __generic_file_aio_write doesn't pass flags and it can be called from
> > unlocked contexts as well.
> 
> Ouch, PF_ flags space seem to be drained already because
> task_struct::flags is just unsigned int so there is just one bit left. I
> am not sure this is the best use for it. This will be a real pain!

OK, so this something that should help you without any risk of false
OOMs. I do not believe that something like that would be accepted
upstream because it is really heavy. We will need to come up with
something more clever for upstream.
I have also added a warning which will trigger when the charge fails. If
you see too many of those messages then there is something bad going on
and the lack of OOM causes userspace to loop without getting any
progress.

So there you go - your personal patch ;) You can drop all other patches.
Please note I have just compile tested it. But it should be pretty
trivial to check it is correct
---