From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx201.postini.com [74.125.245.201]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EF5B6B0008 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:48:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:50:13 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] zram: get rid of lockdep warning Message-ID: <20130204035013.GA13954@kroah.com> References: <1359513702-18709-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <1359513702-18709-4-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <20130204015333.GA6548@kroah.com> <20130204034208.GF2688@blaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130204034208.GF2688@blaptop> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta , Seth Jennings , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Dan Magenheimer , Pekka Enberg , jmarchan@redhat.com On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:42:08PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 05:53:33PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:41:42AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > Lockdep complains about recursive deadlock of zram->init_lock. > > > [1] made it false positive because we can't request IO to zram > > > before setting disksize. Anyway, we should shut lockdep up to > > > avoid many reporting from user. > > > > > > [1] : zram: force disksize setting before using zram > > > > > > Acked-by: Jerome Marchand > > > Acked-by: Nitin Gupta > > > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim > > > --- > > > drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > > drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 12 ++- > > > drivers/staging/zram/zram_sysfs.c | 11 ++- > > > 3 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-) > > > > This patch fails to apply to my staging-next branch, but the three > > others did, so I took them. Please refresh this one and resend if you > > want it applied. > > We must have missed each other. Yes, I was on a flight with no email :) > A few hours ago, I sent to you v7 based on next-20130202. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/3/319 > > v7 includes acks of Jerome and resolve conflict with latest staging. > I believe it is okay to apply your tree. > > Please reapply v7 instead of v6. Please just send the one patch I need to apply here, I added Jerome's acks to the previous patches already. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org