From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx195.postini.com [74.125.245.195]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FB6E6B0007 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 03:05:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:17:39 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: zsmalloc: various cleanups/improvments Message-ID: <20130130041739.GA24517@kroah.com> References: <1359135978-15119-1-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130128034740.GE3321@blaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130128034740.GE3321@blaptop> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Seth Jennings , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Dan Magenheimer , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Robert Jennings , Nitin Gupta On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:47:40PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Seth, > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote: > > These patches are the first 4 patches of the zswap patchset I > > sent out previously. Some recent commits to zsmalloc and > > zcache in staging-next forced a rebase. While I was at it, Nitin > > (zsmalloc maintainer) requested I break these 4 patches out from > > the zswap patchset, since they stand on their own. > > [2/4] and [4/4] is okay to merge current zsmalloc in staging but > [1/4] and [3/4] is dependent on zswap so it should be part of > zswap patchset. I tried to apply patches 2 and 4, but 2 didn't work, so I only applied 4/4. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org