From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au, linux-mm@kvack.org,
695182@bugs.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Negative (setpoint-dirty) in bdi_position_ratio()
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:14:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124141441.GA12745@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130122235438.GB7497@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:54:38AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 20-01-13 11:02:10, paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> > In bdi_position_ratio(), get difference (setpoint-dirty) right even when
> > negative. Both setpoint and dirty are unsigned long, the difference was
> > zero-padded thus wrongly sign-extended to s64. This issue affects all
> > 32-bit architectures, does not affect 64-bit architectures where long
> > and s64 are equivalent.
> >
> > In this function, dirty is between freerun and limit, the pseudo-float x
> > is between [-1,1], expected to be negative about half the time. With
> > zero-padding, instead of a small negative x we obtained a large positive
> > one so bdi_position_ratio() returned garbage.
> >
> > Casting the difference to s64 also prevents overflow with left-shift;
> > though normally these numbers are small and I never observed a 32-bit
> > overflow there.
> >
> > (This patch does not solve the PAE OOM issue.)
> >
> > Paul Szabo psz@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
> > School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia
> >
> > Reported-by: Paul Szabo <psz@maths.usyd.edu.au>
> > Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/695182
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Szabo <psz@maths.usyd.edu.au>
> Ah, good catch. Thanks for the patch. You can add:
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>
> I've also added CC to writeback maintainer.
Applied. Thanks! It's a good fix.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-20 0:02 paul.szabo
2013-01-22 23:54 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-24 14:14 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-01-24 14:57 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-01-24 15:16 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-25 0:15 ` paul.szabo
2013-01-24 23:43 ` paul.szabo
2013-01-25 0:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-01-25 1:47 ` paul.szabo
2013-01-26 3:57 ` paul.szabo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124141441.GA12745@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=695182@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox