linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] memcg: prevent changes to move_charge_at_immigrate during task attach
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:16:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130118141637.GE10701@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357897527-15479-2-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

On Fri 11-01-13 13:45:21, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Currently, we rely on the cgroup_lock() to prevent changes to
> move_charge_at_immigrate during task migration. However, this is only
> needed because the current strategy keeps checking this value throughout
> the whole process. Since all we need is serialization, one needs only to
> guarantee that whatever decision we made in the beginning of a specific
> migration is respected throughout the process.
> 
> We can achieve this by just saving it in mc. By doing this, no kind of
> locking is needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>

I would probably prefer to use a different name so that we know that
move_charge_at_immigrate is a property of the cgroup while the other
immigrate_flags (or whatever) is a temporal state when greping the code.
But nothing serious.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 09255ec..18f4e76 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static struct move_charge_struct {
>  	spinlock_t	  lock; /* for from, to */
>  	struct mem_cgroup *from;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *to;
> +	unsigned long move_charge_at_immigrate;
>  	unsigned long precharge;
>  	unsigned long moved_charge;
>  	unsigned long moved_swap;
> @@ -425,13 +426,13 @@ static struct move_charge_struct {
>  static bool move_anon(void)
>  {
>  	return test_bit(MOVE_CHARGE_TYPE_ANON,
> -					&mc.to->move_charge_at_immigrate);
> +					&mc.move_charge_at_immigrate);
>  }
>  
>  static bool move_file(void)
>  {
>  	return test_bit(MOVE_CHARGE_TYPE_FILE,
> -					&mc.to->move_charge_at_immigrate);
> +					&mc.move_charge_at_immigrate);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -5146,15 +5147,14 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_write(struct cgroup *cgrp,
>  
>  	if (val >= (1 << NR_MOVE_TYPE))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	/*
> -	 * We check this value several times in both in can_attach() and
> -	 * attach(), so we need cgroup lock to prevent this value from being
> -	 * inconsistent.
> +	 * No kind of locking is needed in here, because ->can_attach() will
> +	 * check this value once in the beginning of the process, and then carry
> +	 * on with stale data. This means that changes to this value will only
> +	 * affect task migrations starting after the change.
>  	 */
> -	cgroup_lock();
>  	memcg->move_charge_at_immigrate = val;
> -	cgroup_unlock();
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #else
> @@ -6530,8 +6530,15 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup *cgroup,
>  	struct task_struct *p = cgroup_taskset_first(tset);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgroup);
> +	unsigned long move_charge_at_immigrate;
>  
> -	if (memcg->move_charge_at_immigrate) {
> +	/*
> +	 * We are now commited to this value whatever it is. Changes in this
> +	 * tunable will only affect upcoming migrations, not the current one.
> +	 * So we need to save it, and keep it going.
> +	 */
> +	move_charge_at_immigrate  = memcg->move_charge_at_immigrate;
> +	if (move_charge_at_immigrate) {
>  		struct mm_struct *mm;
>  		struct mem_cgroup *from = mem_cgroup_from_task(p);
>  
> @@ -6551,6 +6558,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_can_attach(struct cgroup *cgroup,
>  			spin_lock(&mc.lock);
>  			mc.from = from;
>  			mc.to = memcg;
> +			mc.move_charge_at_immigrate = move_charge_at_immigrate;
>  			spin_unlock(&mc.lock);
>  			/* We set mc.moving_task later */
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-18 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-11  9:45 [PATCH v2 0/7] replace cgroup_lock with local memcg lock Glauber Costa
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] memcg: prevent changes to move_charge_at_immigrate during task attach Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 14:16   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] memcg: split part of memcg creation to css_online Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 15:25   ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-18 19:28     ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-21  7:33     ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-21  8:38       ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-21  8:42         ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] memcg: provide online test for memcg Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 15:37   ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-18 15:56     ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-18 19:42       ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 19:43         ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 19:41     ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] memcg: fast hierarchy-aware child test Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 16:06   ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-21  7:58     ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-21  8:34       ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-21  8:41         ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-21  9:15           ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-21  9:19             ` Glauber Costa
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] May god have mercy on my soul Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 16:07   ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] memcg: replace cgroup_lock with memcg specific memcg_lock Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 16:21   ` Michal Hocko
2013-01-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] memcg: increment static branch right after limit set Glauber Costa
2013-01-18 16:23   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130118141637.GE10701@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox