From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx103.postini.com [74.125.245.103]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AFB96B0068 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:01:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:01:34 -0800 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: Unique commit-id for "mm: compaction: [P,p]artially revert capture of suitable high-order page" Message-ID: <20130114170134.GA26655@kroah.com> References: <20130114103612.GO13304@suse.de> <20130114130911.GQ13304@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130114130911.GQ13304@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Sedat Dilek , Linus Torvalds , LKML , linux-mm , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:09:11PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:27:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:12:45PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > >> Hi Linus, > > >> > > >> I see two different commit-id for an identical patch (only subject > > >> line differs). > > >> [1] seems to be applied directly and [2] came with a merge of akpm-fixes. > > >> What is in case of backports for -stable kernels? > > > > > > I do not expect it to matter. I was going to use > > > 8fb74b9fb2b182d54beee592350d9ea1f325917a as the commit ID whenever I got > > > the complaint mail from Greg's tools about a 3.7 merge failure. The 3.7.2 > > > backport looks like this. > > > > > > > Oh cool and thanks! > > Are you planning to resend this backport-patch to the lists w/ a "3.7" > > (or for-3.7) in the commit-subject? > > > > Yes, when I get the reject mail from Greg's tools. You should have that rejection email now :) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org