From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx105.postini.com [74.125.245.105]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3CC46B005A for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:03:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:03:52 +0000 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending Message-ID: <20130110200352.GA5316@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20130102200848.GA4500@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130104160148.GB3885@suse.de> <20130106120700.GA24671@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130107122516.GC3885@suse.de> <20130107223850.GA21311@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130108224313.GA13304@suse.de> <20130108232325.GA5948@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130109133746.GD13304@suse.de> <20130110092511.GA32333@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130110194212.GJ13304@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130110194212.GJ13304@suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Mel Gorman wrote: > Thanks Eric, it's much appreciated. However, I'm still very much in favour > of a partial revert as in retrospect the implementation of capture took the > wrong approach. Could you confirm the following patch works for you? > It's should functionally have the same effect as the first revert and > there are only minor changes from the last revert prototype I sent you > but there is no harm in being sure. Thanks, I was just about to report back on the last partial revert being successful :) Will start testing this one, now. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org