From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx110.postini.com [74.125.245.110]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91CED6B004D for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:25:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 13:25:36 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pageattr fixes for pmd/pte_present Message-ID: <20130108122536.GD9163@redhat.com> References: <1355767224-13298-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> <1357441197.9001.6.camel@kernel.cn.ibm.com> <20130107135344.5ca426ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <50EB4455.60808@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50EB4455.60808@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrew Morton , Simon Jeons , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Shaohua Li , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins Hi, On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:55:33PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/07/2013 01:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> > >> What's the status of these two patches? > > > > I expect they fell through the christmas cracks. I added them to my > > (getting large) queue of x86 patches for consideration by the x86 > > maintainers. > > Yes, I'm just coming back online today, and needless to say, I have a > *huge* backlog. > > > Why do you ask? It seems the bug is a pretty minor one and that we > > need only fix it in 3.8 or even 3.9. Is that supposition incorrect? > > I would like to know this as well. It is a minor regression that was reported. The only way to notice it should be to use the crash tool or other non standard root stuff. So it shouldn't be too urgent. Thanks, Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org