linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
	Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/49] mm: numa: Add pte updates, hinting and migration stats
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 09:21:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130108012115.GA14879@hacker.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107152931.GM3885@suse.de>

On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:29:31PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:42:24AM -0600, Simon Jeons wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 10:23 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> > It is tricky to quantify the basic cost of automatic NUMA placement in a
>> > meaningful manner. This patch adds some vmstats that can be used as part
>> > of a basic costing model.
>> 
>> Hi Gorman, 
>> 
>> > 
>> > u    = basic unit = sizeof(void *)
>> > Ca   = cost of struct page access = sizeof(struct page) / u
>> > Cpte = Cost PTE access = Ca
>> > Cupdate = Cost PTE update = (2 * Cpte) + (2 * Wlock)
>> > 	where Cpte is incurred twice for a read and a write and Wlock
>> > 	is a constant representing the cost of taking or releasing a
>> > 	lock
>> > Cnumahint = Cost of a minor page fault = some high constant e.g. 1000
>> > Cpagerw = Cost to read or write a full page = Ca + PAGE_SIZE/u
>> 
>> Why cpagerw = Ca + PAGE_SIZE/u instead of Cpte + PAGE_SIZE/u ?
>> 
>
>Because I was thinking of the cost of just access the struct page.  Arguably
>it would be both Ca and Cpte and if I wanted to be very comprehensive I
>would also take into account the potential cost of kmapping the page in
>the 32-bit case but it'd be overkill. The cost of the PTE and struct page
>is negligible in comparison to the actual copy.
>
>> > Ci = Cost of page isolation = Ca + Wi
>> > 	where Wi is a constant that should reflect the approximate cost
>> > 	of the locking operation
>> > Cpagecopy = Cpagerw + (Cpagerw * Wnuma) + Ci + (Ci * Wnuma)
>> > 	where Wnuma is the approximate NUMA factor. 1 is local. 1.2
>> > 	would imply that remote accesses are 20% more expensive
>> > 
>> > Balancing cost = Cpte * numa_pte_updates +
>> > 		Cnumahint * numa_hint_faults +
>> > 		Ci * numa_pages_migrated +
>> > 		Cpagecopy * numa_pages_migrated
>> > 
>> 
>> Since Cpagecopy has already accumulated ci why count ci twice ?
>> 
>
>Good point. Interestingly when I went to fix this in mmtests I found
>that I accounted for Ci properly there but got it wrong in the
>changelog.
>
>> > Note that numa_pages_migrated is used as a measure of how many pages
>> > were isolated even though it would miss pages that failed to migrate. A
>> > vmstat counter could have been added for it but the isolation cost is
>> > pretty marginal in comparison to the overall cost so it seemed overkill.
>> > 
>> > The ideal way to measure automatic placement benefit would be to count
>> > the number of remote accesses versus local accesses and do something like
>> > 
>> > 	benefit = (remote_accesses_before - remove_access_after) * Wnuma
>> > 
>> > but the information is not readily available. As a workload converges, the
>> > expection would be that the number of remote numa hints would reduce to 0.
>> > 
>> > 	convergence = numa_hint_faults_local / numa_hint_faults
>> > 		where this is measured for the last N number of
>> > 		numa hints recorded. When the workload is fully
>> > 		converged the value is 1.
>> > 
>> 
>> convergence tend to 0 is better or 1 is better
>
>1 is better.
>
>> If tend to 1, Cpte *
>> numa_pte_updates + Cnumahint * numa_hint_faults are just waste, where I
>> miss?
>> 
>
>I don't get the question, waste of what? None of these calculations are
>used by the kernel. The kernel only maintains counters and the point of
>the changelog was to illustrate how the counters can be used to do some
>meaningful evaluation.
>

Hi Mel,

I think he means that if most page faults are from local node, Cpte * 
numa_pte_updates + Cnumahint * numa_hint_faults_local which are overhead 
from numa balancing are waste since actually we don't need NUMA hinting 
page fault here. Your adapt scan rate patch in this patchset can be 
band-aid to a certain extent. :)

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>-- 
>Mel Gorman
>SUSE Labs
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
>see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-08  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07 10:23 [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10 Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 01/49] x86: mm: only do a local tlb flush in ptep_set_access_flags() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 02/49] x86: mm: drop TLB flush from ptep_set_access_flags Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 03/49] mm,generic: only flush the local TLB in ptep_set_access_flags Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 04/49] x86/mm: Introduce pte_accessible() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 05/49] mm: Only flush the TLB when clearing an accessible pte Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 06/49] mm: Count the number of pages affected in change_protection() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 07/49] mm: Optimize the TLB flush of sys_mprotect() and change_protection() users Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 08/49] mm: compaction: Move migration fail/success stats to migrate.c Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 09/49] mm: migrate: Add a tracepoint for migrate_pages Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 10/49] mm: compaction: Add scanned and isolated counters for compaction Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 11/49] mm: numa: define _PAGE_NUMA Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 12/49] mm: numa: pte_numa() and pmd_numa() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 13/49] mm: numa: Support NUMA hinting page faults from gup/gup_fast Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 14/49] mm: numa: split_huge_page: transfer the NUMA type from the pmd to the pte Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 15/49] mm: numa: Create basic numa page hinting infrastructure Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 16/49] mm: mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 17/49] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_NOOP Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 18/49] mm: mempolicy: Check for misplaced page Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 19/49] mm: migrate: Introduce migrate_misplaced_page() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 20/49] mm: migrate: Drop the misplaced pages reference count if the target node is full Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 21/49] mm: mempolicy: Use _PAGE_NUMA to migrate pages Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 22/49] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_LAZY Mel Gorman
2013-01-05  5:18   ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-07 15:14     ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 23/49] mm: mempolicy: Implement change_prot_numa() in terms of change_protection() Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 24/49] mm: mempolicy: Hide MPOL_NOOP and MPOL_MF_LAZY from userspace for now Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 25/49] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration Mel Gorman
2013-01-04 11:56   ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 26/49] mm: sched: numa: Implement constant, per task Working Set Sampling (WSS) rate Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 27/49] sched, numa, mm: Count WS scanning against present PTEs, not virtual memory ranges Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 28/49] mm: sched: numa: Implement slow start for working set sampling Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 29/49] mm: numa: Add pte updates, hinting and migration stats Mel Gorman
2013-01-04 11:42   ` Simon Jeons
2013-01-07 15:29     ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-08  1:21       ` Wanpeng Li
2013-01-08  1:21       ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 30/49] mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 31/49] mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 32/49] mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 33/49] mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 34/49] mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 35/49] sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 36/49] mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 37/49] mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 38/49] mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 39/49] mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely task<->node relationships Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 40/49] mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 41/49] mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 42/49] mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 43/49] mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 44/49] mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case Mel Gorman
2013-01-05  8:42   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-01-07 15:37     ` Mel Gorman
2013-01-05  8:42   ` Wanpeng Li
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 45/49] mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 46/49] mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 47/49] mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 48/49] mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 10:23 ` [PATCH 49/49] mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable Mel Gorman
2012-12-07 11:01 ` [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10 Ingo Molnar
2012-12-09 20:36   ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-09 21:17     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-12-10  8:44       ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-10  5:07     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10  6:28       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 12:44         ` [PATCH] sched: Fix task_numa_fault() + KSM crash Ingo Molnar
2012-12-13 13:57           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10  8:46       ` [PATCH 00/49] Automatic NUMA Balancing v10 Mel Gorman
2012-12-10 12:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 11:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 11:53       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 15:24       ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-11  1:02         ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-11  8:52           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-11  9:18             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-11 15:22               ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-11 16:30             ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-17 10:33               ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 16:42 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 19:23   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-10 23:35     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-10 23:40   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-12-13 13:21 ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='20130108012115.GA14879@hacker.(null)' \
    --to=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lkml.alex@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=simon.jeons@gmail.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox