From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] mm: vmscan: clean up get_scan_count()
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:49:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121221024957.GE7147@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121219160805.658f724f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:08:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:12:35 -0500
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> > Reclaim pressure balance between anon and file pages is calculated
> > through a tuple of numerators and a shared denominator.
> >
> > Exceptional cases that want to force-scan anon or file pages configure
> > the numerators and denominator such that one list is preferred, which
> > is not necessarily the most obvious way:
> >
> > fraction[0] = 1;
> > fraction[1] = 0;
> > denominator = 1;
> > goto out;
> >
> > Make this easier by making the force-scan cases explicit and use the
> > fractionals only in case they are calculated from reclaim history.
> >
> > And bring the variable declarations/definitions in order.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > + u64 fraction[2], uninitialized_var(denominator);
>
> Using uninitialized_var() puts Linus into rant mode. Unkindly, IMO:
> uninitialized_var() is documentarily useful and reduces bloat. There is
> a move afoot to replace it with
>
> int foo = 0; /* gcc */
>
> To avoid getting ranted at we can do
>
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-vmscan-clean-up-get_scan_count-fix
> +++ a/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1658,7 +1658,8 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec
> unsigned long *nr)
> {
> struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = &lruvec->reclaim_stat;
> - u64 fraction[2], uninitialized_var(denominator);
> + u64 fraction[2];
> + u64 denominator = 0;
> struct zone *zone = lruvec_zone(lruvec);
> unsigned long anon_prio, file_prio;
> enum scan_balance scan_balance;
Makes sense, I guess, but then you have to delete this line from the
changelog:
"And bring the variable declarations/definitions in order."
Or change it to "partial" order or something... :-)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-17 18:12 [patch 0/8] page reclaim bits v2 Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 1/7] mm: memcg: only evict file pages when we have plenty Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 18:15 ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-18 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 2/7] mm: vmscan: save work scanning (almost) empty LRU lists Johannes Weiner
2012-12-19 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-20 13:55 ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-21 3:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 3/7] mm: vmscan: clarify how swappiness, highest priority, memcg interact Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 18:16 ` Rik van Riel
2012-12-17 19:37 ` Satoru Moriya
2012-12-17 20:05 ` Michal Hocko
2012-12-18 10:04 ` Mel Gorman
2012-12-18 15:16 ` Satoru Moriya
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 4/7] mm: vmscan: improve comment on low-page cache handling Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 5/7] mm: vmscan: clean up get_scan_count() Johannes Weiner
2012-12-20 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-21 2:49 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 6/7] mm: vmscan: compaction works against zones, not lruvecs Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 18:12 ` [patch 7/7] mm: reduce rmap overhead for ex-KSM page copies created on swap faults Johannes Weiner
2012-12-17 22:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-12-19 7:01 ` Simon Jeons
2012-12-19 17:58 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121221024957.GE7147@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox