From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Vasilis Liaskovitis <vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
wency@cn.fujitsu.com, lenb@kernel.org, toshi.kani@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:33:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121116213310.GA12925@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11897248.2VNutIHaJi@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:17:17PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 11:22:47 AM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > As discussed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1581581/
> > the driver core remove function needs to always succeed. This means we need
> > to know that the device can be successfully removed before acpi_bus_trim /
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device are called. This can cause panics when OSPM-initiated
> > eject or driver unbind of memory devices fails e.g with:
> >
> > echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> > echo "PNP0C80:XX" > /sys/bus/acpi/drivers/acpi_memhotplug/unbind
> >
> > since the ACPI core goes ahead and ejects the device regardless of whether the
> > the memory is still in use or not.
> >
> > For this reason a new acpi_device operation called prepare_remove is introduced.
> > This operation should be registered for acpi devices whose removal (from kernel
> > perspective) can fail. Memory devices fall in this category.
> > A similar operation is introduced in bus_type to safely handle driver unbind
> > from the device driver core.
> >
> > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device and driver_unbind are changed to handle removal in 2
> > steps:
> > - preparation for removal i.e. perform part of removal that can fail. Should
> > succeed for device and all its children.
> > - if above step was successfull, proceed to actual device removal
> >
> > With this patchset, only acpi memory devices use the new prepare_remove
> > device operation. The actual memory removal (VM-related offline and other memory
> > cleanups) is moved to prepare_remove. The old remove operation just cleans up
> > the acpi structures. Directly ejecting PNP0C80 memory devices works safely. I
> > haven't tested yet with an ACPI container which contains memory devices.
> >
> > v1->v2:
> > - new patch to introduce bus_type prepare_remove callback. Needed to prepare
> > removal on driver unbinding from device-driver core.
> > - v1 patches 1 and 2 simplified and merged in one. acpi_bus_trim does not require
> > argument changes.
> >
> > Comments welcome.
> >
> > Vasilis Liaskovitis (3):
> > driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type
> > acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops
> > acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation
> >
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/base/bus.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 ++
> > include/linux/device.h | 2 ++
> > 5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> CCs of all driver core patches have to go to Greg Kroah-Hartman.
I previously rejected this, so I don't see why I would take it this time
around :(
Please, no driver core changes for acpi, I don't see why it is suddenly
so special to need stuff like this that can't just be done in the ACPI
bus code itself.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 10:22 Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] driver core: Introduce prepare_remove in bus_type Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove operation in acpi_device_ops Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-15 10:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] acpi_memhotplug: Add prepare_remove operation Vasilis Liaskovitis
2012-11-16 21:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] acpi: Introduce prepare_remove device operation Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-11-16 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 22:45 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:14 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-16 23:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-16 23:35 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17 0:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17 0:08 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-17 0:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-17 0:25 ` Toshi Kani
2012-11-18 16:16 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121116213310.GA12925@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox