From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx196.postini.com [74.125.245.196]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FA8C6B0070 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:40:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:40:14 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Message-ID: <20121114084014.GB17111@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1352820639-13521-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz> <50A3C42F.9020901@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A3C42F.9020901@parallels.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner , Ying Han , Tejun Heo On Wed 14-11-12 17:17:51, Glauber Costa wrote: [...] > Why can't we reuse the scheduler iterator and move it to kernel/cgroup.c? I do not care much about the internal implementation of the core iterators. Those implemented by Tejun make sense to me. I just want to get rid of css->id based ones. Memcg iterator, however, still needs its own iterator on top because we have to handle the parallel reclaimers. [...] -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org