linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:19:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121031161900.GG31804@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121031070202.GR15767@bbox>

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:02:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:43:07PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:39:48AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > Greg, what do you think about LTSI?
> > > Is it proper feature to add it? For it, still do I need ACK from mm developers?
> > 
> > It's already in LTSI, as it's in the 3.4 kernel, right?
> 
> Right. But as I look, it seems to be based on 3.4.11 which doesn't have
> recent bug fix and enhances and current 3.4.16 also doesn't include it.

You can ask for those bugfixes to get backported to the stable/longterm
kernel tree, see Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to do
this properly.

> Just out of curiosity.
> 
> Is there any rule about update period in long-term kernel?
> I mean how often you release long-term kernel.

About once a week lately.

> Is there any rule about update period in LTSI kernel based on long-term kernel?

No, the LTSI kernel work has been slow due to the lack of time on my
part lately.

> If I get the answer on above two quesion, I can expect later what LTSI kernel
> version include feature I need.
> 
> Another question.
> For example, There is A feature in mainline and A has no problem but
> someone invents new wheel "B" which is better than A so it replace A totally
> in recent mainline. As following stable-kernel rule, it's not a real bug fix
> so I guess stable kernel will never replace A with B.

That is correct.

> It means LTSI never get a chance to use new wheel. Right?

No, you can submit the same patches for the LTSI kernel as well, they
will probably be accepted as the rules are much more "loose" for the
LTSI tree compared to the normal stable/longterm kernel rules.  Which is
the primary reason it is around.

Hope this helps,

greg k-h

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-31 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-29  8:56 Minchan Kim
2012-10-29  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] zsmalloc: promote to lib/ Minchan Kim
2012-10-29  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] zram: promote zram from staging Minchan Kim
2012-10-29  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] zram: select ZSMALLOC when ZRAM is configured Minchan Kim
2012-10-29 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion Seth Jennings
2012-10-31  1:06 ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31  1:42   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-31  2:04     ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31  2:16       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-31  2:39         ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31  2:43           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-10-31  7:02             ` Minchan Kim
2012-10-31 16:19               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-11-01  2:45                 ` Minchan Kim
     [not found] <<1351501009-15111-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org>
2012-10-29 15:25 ` Dan Magenheimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121031161900.GG31804@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=konrad@darnok.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox